Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 2014 Apr 8;77(1):59–83. doi: 10.1111/rssb.12064

Table 1.

Cluster analysis for the ozone data. “State ave trend” is the posterior mean of the average of the β(S) at the grid cells in the state.

State Number of Monitors Number of grid points State ave trend Prob state ave < −0.1 Proportion non-null Post prob active
Alabama 25 234 −0.19 0.78 0.65 0.25
Connecticut 9 28 −0.38 0.97 0.92 0.86*
Delaware 6 8 −0.36 0.95 0.91 0.81*
Florida 43 235 −0.53 1.00 0.93 0.93*
Georgia 23 271 −0.54 1.00 0.96 0.97*
Illinois 35 277 −0.66 1.00 0.98 0.99*
Indiana 41 185 −0.32 0.98 0.84 0.68
Kentucky 32 195 −0.25 0.91 0.75 0.45
Maine 8 159 −0.51 0.99 0.94 0.90*
Maryland 19 55 −0.30 0.96 0.83 0.64
Massachusetts 14 36 −0.26 0.91 0.76 0.51
Michigan 26 296 −0.50 1.00 0.92 0.92*
Mississippi 8 220 −0.27 0.87 0.76 0.52
New Hampshire 13 46 −0.23 0.85 0.73 0.46
New Jersey 13 39 −0.27 0.92 0.81 0.59
New York 33 262 −0.15 0.65 0.59 0.18
North Carolina 41 227 −0.23 0.88 0.71 0.33
Ohio 48 202 −0.16 0.77 0.62 0.15
Pennsylvania 46 219 −0.23 0.90 0.70 0.20
Rhode Island 3 8 −0.47 0.99 0.98 0.96*
South Carolina 20 144 −0.42 0.98 0.89 0.81*
Tennessee 25 185 −0.25 0.89 0.73 0.41
Vermont 2 55 −0.18 0.69 0.63 0.34
Virginia 23 188 −0.25 0.88 0.73 0.40
West Virginia 9 115 −0.24 0.83 0.72 0.45
Wisconsin 31 292 −0.64 0.98 0.92 0.86*

States which is significant at α = 0.1 are denoted “*”.