Table 1.
Country | Study Design |
Character of site |
Reported reduction | Observed period of decline |
Control or comparator | Adjustment for Rainfall |
Time of deployment relative to evidence of malaria decline |
Reported Reasons | |||
Non-malarial cases |
Non-intervention area or prior data |
ACT | ITN | IRS | |||||||
Coastal Kenya77 |
Retrospective review of routine HMIS data |
One routinely researched site and two adjoining non-research sites |
63%, 53% and 28% reduction in malaria cases in 3 district hospitals |
1999, 2006 |
Yes | Yes | Yes | After | After | Not deployed | Malaria control interventions |
Ifakara, Tanzania78 |
Retrospective review of data from cohort studies |
Routinely researched site |
Reduced from 0.8 to 0.43 episodes per child per year |
1995–2000 | Yes | No | No | After | After. Net used before were mostly untreated and at coverage less than 20% |
Not deployed | Economic improvements, liberalization of health sector and malaria control interventions |
Zanzibar, Tanzania44 | Before and After intervention | Not routinely researched |
77% reduction in malaria admissions |
2003–2005 | No | Yes | Yes | Before | Before | After | Artemisinin combination Therapy and Insecticide Treated Nets |
Mozambique, South Africa and Swaziland79 |
Before and After intervention | Not routinely researched |
> 60% fall in parasite prevalence in all 3 zones studied |
1999–2005 | No | Yes | No | After | Not deployed | Before | Indoor residual spraying |
Guinea-Bissau80 | Comparative, Cross-sectional | Routinely researched site |
Reduced from 44–79% to 3% | 1994, 1999, 2003–4 |
No | Yes | No** | After | After. Only 5% of nets used before were treated |
Not deployed | Untreated bed nets and urbanization |
Eritrea81 | Before (Retrospective review of routine HMIS data) and After (cross-sectional survey) intervention |
Not routinely researched |
Decrease in malaria incidence of 83.3% and case fatality by from 0.21 to 0.14% |
2000–4 | No | Yes | No*** | Not deployed |
Before | Before | Climate change and malaria control methods (ITNs, IRS and early case detection and treatment) |
Rwanda and Ethiopia82 | Before and After intervention | Not routinely researched |
55% and 73% fall in under-5 in-patient cases in Rwanda & Ethiopia |
2001–7 | Yes | Yes | No | Before | Before | Not deployed. Used routinely before and after in Ethiopia |
Stronger correlation with ACT and ITN scale-up in Rwanda. Less firmer in the case of Ethiopia due to epidemic nature of transmission |
Senegal83 | Prospective. Nested in clinical trial |
Not routinely researched. |
Incidence rate from 46.1% to 37.5% |
1998 – 2002 | No | No | No*** | Before | Not deployed | Not deployed | None particularly ACT considered unlikely |
Tanzania 84 | Before and After intervention | Not routinely researched |
4–6-fold reduction in EIR, | 1990–4 to 2001–3 |
No | Yes | No | Not deployed |
Before | Not deployed | Deployment of both treated and untreated nets) |
South Africa85 | Retrospective review of routine HMIS data |
Not routinely researched |
99% decline in cases and admissions, 97% decline in cases |
2000–3 | No | Yes | No | Before | Not deployed | Before | Attributable to mass deployment of ACT and IRS |
Rwanda 86 | Retrospective review of routine HMIS data + House-hold surveys |
Not routinely researched |
72% decline in confirmed cases, 47% decline in malaria deaths |
2006–2010 | Yes | Yes | No | Before | Before | Not deployed | Scale-up in ITN and ACT coverage |