Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 21;3(4):e001103. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001103

Table 6.

Sources of sPAP Overestimation or Underestimation Leading Correspondingly to Overdiagnosis or Underdiagnosis of Pulmonary Hypertension

Overestimation n=99 Underestimation n=159
CW Doppler, n (%)
Incomplete spectral wave envelope 16 (16.2) 110 (69.6)
Maximal velocity boundary artifacts (“fringes”) 33 (33.3) 2 (1.3)
Spectral gain set too soft 12 (12.1) 1 (0.6)
Velocity range set too high 7 (7.1) 1 (0.6)
Sweep velocity set to slow 3 (3.0) 1 (0.6)
Valve closure artifacts (“snaps”) 2 (2.0) 2 (1.3)
Atrial fibrillation 7 (7.1) 3 (1.9)
Severe tricuspid regurgitation 1 (1.0) 11 (7.0)
Inferior vena cava, n (%)
Respiration dynamics misinterpreted 9 (9.1) 20 (12.6)
Could not be depicted 8 (8.1) 7 (4.4)
Aorta mistaken as inferior vena cava 1 (1.0) 0 (0)

Overestimation was defined when sPAP assessed with Doppler echocardiography was >35 mm Hg and mPAP measured invasively was <25 mm Hg, whereas underestimation was defined when sPAP assessed with Doppler echocardiography was ≤35 mm Hg and mPAP measured invasively was ≥25 mm Hg. CW indicates continuous‐wave Doppler; mPAP, pulmonary artery mean pressure; sPAP, systolic pulmonary artery pressure.