Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ophthalmology. 2014 Mar 13;121(7):1350–1358. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.01.017

Table 1.

Baseline demographics of the group the visual field damage group and the non-visual field damage group

By Subject Visual Field Damage (n=38) Non-Visual Field Damage (n=256) Difference (P-value)
Gender (% Female) 63.2% 62.1% 1.000

Age (years) 67.8 ± 10.7 64.0 ± 11.3 0.111

Race
African descent, % 36.8 30.5 0.456
European descent, % 63.2 69.5
By Eye Visual Field Damage (n=40) Non-Visual Field Damage (n=414) Difference (P-value)
Diagnosis
GON, % 60.0 46.1 0.100
OHT, % 40.0 53.9

Mean IOP during follow-up (mmHg) 18.6 ± 4.7 18.1 ± 3.8 0.613

MD (dB) −0.8 ± 1.4 −0.3 ± 1.3 0.026*

CCT (μm) 547.7 ± 41.7 554.5 ± 40.7 0.431

PSD 1. 7 ± 0.3 1.5 ± 0.3 <0.001*

GON: glaucomatous optic neuropathy, OHT: ocular hypertension, IOP: intraocular pressure, MD: mean deviation, CCT: central corneal thickness, PSD: Pattern Standard Deviation