Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 31.
Published in final edited form as: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015 Feb;67(2):288–296. doi: 10.1002/acr.22417

Table 3.

Fatigue Task Performance in people with fibromyalgia (n=24) compared to healthy controls (n=33) Data for fatigue task performance during single and dual fatigue tasks with covariates of BMI and Depression (CESD). Data are mean (M) ± S.E.M. (M) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Performance Measure All Subjects FM HC P Value FM vs. HC
CFT Total Words M 255.54 ± 6.88 255.04 ± 10.84 255.90 ± 9.03 0.65
CI 241.76 to 269.32 232.59 to 277.48 237.51 to 274.30
PFT Total Transfer (s) M 911.31 ± 25.99 980.91 ± 50.81 860.69 ± 22.39 0.01
CI 859.25 to 963.38 875.79 to 1086.04 815.06 to 906.32
DFT Total Words M 195.29 ± 8.65 207.58 ± 16.33 186.36 ± 9.01 0.30
CI 177.95 to 212.64 173.79 to 241.37 168.00 to 204.72
Total Transfer (s) M 973.57 ± 34.42 1065.62 ± 58.82 906.63 ± 37.95 0.08
CI 904.61 to 1042.82 943.93 to 1187.31 829.31 to 983.95

BMI=Body mass index, CESD=Center for Epidemiology – Depression, S.E.M. =standard error of measure, FM=fibromyalgia group, HC=healthy control group, CFT=Cognitive fatigue performance task, PFT=physical fatigue performance task, DFT=dual fatigue performance task

**

p<0.01 Significant difference between fibromyalgia group and healthy control group