Table 3.
Model 1 |
Model 2 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variable | Cases N (%) |
Controls N (%) |
Hazard Ratio (95% CI) |
p Value |
Hazard Ratio (95% CI) |
p Value |
Matched analysisa | ||||||
T/S quintiles | ||||||
Q1: <0.43 | 27 (19.9) | 22 (16.2) | 2.85 (0.98, 8.25) | 0.05 | 2.54 (0.88, 7.32) | 0.09 |
Q2: 0.43 – 0.59 | 28 (20.6) | 31 (22.8) | 2.02 (0.79, 5.18) | 0.14 | 1.95 (0.77, 4.92) | 0.16 |
Q3: 0.59 – 0.78 | 20 (14.7) | 32 (23.5) | 1.00 (reference) | -- | 1.00 (reference) | -- |
Q4: 0.78 – 1.16 | 23 (16.9) | 31 (22.8) | 1.45 (0.54, 3.92) | 0.47 | 1.42 (0.52, 3.83) | 0.49 |
Q5: > 1.16 | 38 (27.9) | 20 (14.7) | 5.58 (2.21, 14.11) | 0.0003 | 5.04 (1.98, 12.84) | 0.0007 |
Proportional hazards models for nested case-control analyses stratified on matched pairs. Model 1 was adjusted for education; Model 2 also included APOE ε4 allele and type 2 diabetes.