Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 24;7:415–423. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2014.12.014

Table 6.

LI comparison at different threshold values within patient group.


Tumor p-values
Vascular lesion p-values
Antonym (df) = 112 Letter (df) = 82 Text-read (df) = 48 Antonym (df) = 44 Letter (df) = 18 Text-listen (df) = 22
t < 2.0 vs. t < 2.6 0.017315 0.261239 0.982891 0.171803 0.261758 0.364700
t < 2.0 vs. t < 3.5 0.002512a 0.785271 0.026236 0.001628a 0.072703 0.625992
t < 2.0 vs. t < 4.0 0.001654a 0.46902 0.003302a 0.000018a 0.142270 0.011144
t < 2.6 vs. t < 3.5 0.014164 0.59038 0.004038a 0.000156a 0.334689 0.859786
t < 2.6 vs. t < 4.0 0.002848a 0.294369 0.012397 0.000074a 0.507890 0.017450
t < 3.5 vs. t < 4.0 0.015845 0.142492 0.094924 0.006476a 0.820798 0.175559
a

Statistically significant at p < 0.008, corrected.