Abstract
Refractory and fatal hemodynamic depression remarkably occurred eight hours after left carotid artery stenting in a 62-year-old male who had no hemodynamic instability till then; possible contributory factors were pre-existing moderate left ventricular systolic dysfunction and new-onset complete heart block caused by vasopressor-induced sympathetic stimulation in the presence of covert distal conduction system disease.
Keywords: Carotid stenosis, Stents, Left ventricular dysfunction, Cardiac conduction defect
1. Introduction
Hemodynamic depression (HD) is the most common adverse event following carotid artery stenting (CAS); it occurs due to the stretching of carotid sinus baroreceptors resulting in stimulation of vagal fibers.1 Hypotension and bradycardia, the most frequent manifestations of HD, occur mostly at the time of balloon inflation post-stent deployment, and usually settle in the immediate post-procedural period; HD does not lead to excess mortality, stroke or myocardial infarction since it is usually a transient phenomenon.2 HD occurring beyond six hours of CAS is most often a recurrent episode in patients who had HD earlier; occurrence of the first episode of HD beyond six hours of CAS is rare.1 We report a case of severe refractory HD occurring eight hours after CAS, despite absence of HD earlier, that was associated with new-onset complete heart block (CHB) and fatal myocardial depression.
2. Case report
A 62-year-old man presented with bilateral lower limb claudication. He had sustained a cerebrovascular accident with right hemiparesis in the past that had recovered fully. There was also a past history of inferior wall myocardial infarction, but there were no cardiac symptoms currently. He had diabetes mellitus, systemic hypertension and a 30-pack-year history of smoking. Physical examination revealed left carotid bruit and feeble lower limb pulses. His renal function was normal. The electrocardiogram (Fig.1A) showed normal sinus rhythm (95/m), non-specific intra-ventricular conduction defect (QRS duration 127 ms) with QRS axis minus 59° and normal PR interval (169 ms). The echocardiogram revealed moderate left ventricular systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction 43%) with inferior and posterior wall hypokinesia.
Fig. 1.

A. Baseline ECG showing normal sinus rhythm and intra-ventricular conduction defect with left axis deviation. B. ECG rhythm strip soon after onset of hemodynamic depression and resuscitation. Complete heart block, rapid p rate and broad QRS complexes are seen.
Coronary angiography showed triple-vessel coronary artery disease with discrete 80% stenosis in the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery and diffuse narrowing in the right and circumflex coronary arteries. Peripheral angiography revealed long-segment 90% stenosis in the left internal carotid artery just after its origin (Fig.2A), and significant obstructive disease in both external iliac arteries as well as in the right superficial femoral and anterior tibial arteries. In view of the left ventricular systolic dysfunction, diffuse vascular disease and multiple medical co-morbidities, he was considered a poor candidate for anesthesia and surgery. After written informed consent, percutaneous coronary, bilateral external iliac and left internal carotid artery revascularization was planned in a staged manner with a view to limit the radiographic contrast load in each sitting. The indication to treat the left internal carotid artery lesion was the history of recovered right hemiparesis and high-grade of stenosis. In the first sitting, angioplasty and stenting of the left anterior descending coronary and bilateral external iliac arteries was successfully performed, with no subsequent deterioration of renal function. Carotid intervention was performed two days later. Anti-hypertensive medications, including a beta-blocker, were administered as usual on the morning of the procedure.
Fig. 2.

A. Baseline left carotid angiogram showing high-grade long left internal carotid artery stenosis. B. Post-stenting angiogram showing satisfactory outcome. C. Left internal carotid angiogram showing intra-cranial stenotic lesion (arrow) that was not treated; the left middle cerebral artery is seen filling normally, but not the left anterior cerebral artery. D. Right internal carotid angiogram showing absence of obstructive lesions and filling of both anterior cerebral arteries (arrows).
Using percutaneous femoral arterial access and an 8F guiding catheter, the left internal carotid artery lesion was crossed with a 0.014″ Cougar wire (Medtronic) and a 6 mm SpiderFx embolic protection filter (eV3/Covidien) was deployed distal to the lesion. The lesion was dilated with a 3 mm coronary balloon and stented with a 7 × 40 mm Acculink carotid stent (Abbott Vascular); post-deployment, the stent was dilated with a 5 mm balloon at 12 atm. Atropine 0.6 mg was administered intravenously just before stent deployment. Temporary insertion of a right ventricular pacing lead was not done. Neither bradycardia nor hypotension was encountered during the procedure. Final angiogram (Fig.2B) showed minimal residual stenosis, no dissection and normal flow across the stented segment. Completion cerebral angiograms showed no evidence of distal embolization; there was another lesion in the intracranial segment of the left internal carotid artery causing 70% stenosis (Fig. 2C) which was left alone; the left middle cerebral artery was supplied by the left internal carotid artery, whereas the left anterior cerebral artery was supplied by the right internal carotid artery via the anterior communicating artery (Fig. 2D). Femoral sheaths were removed immediately after the procedure and hemostasis was obtained by manual compression. There were no peri-procedural complications and patient remained hemodynamically stable for the next several hours, during which time his blood pressure ranged from 100/60 to 120/70 mm Hg and the pulse rate varied between 72 and 84/m without inotropic support.
Eight hours after the procedure the patient suddenly became unresponsive with no premonitory symptoms; peripheral arterial pulses could not be felt and blood pressure was not recordable. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was promptly initiated, which included administration of adrenaline and atropine. ECG done soon after this showed a rapid atrial rate, CHB and slow ventricular rate (Fig.1B). External cardiac pacing was immediately initiated, after which transvenous right ventricular pacing was begun. Despite this he continued to be hypotensive. Severe global left ventricular hypokinesia was seen on echocardiography. Resuscitatory efforts were unsuccessful and he expired an hour later.
3. Discussion
The most frequent complication of CAS is HD in the form of hypotension and bradycardia. The incidence of HD has varied from 25% to 84%.3,4 A recent meta-analysis2 of 27 randomized trials with over 4000 patients showed the occurrence of HD in 39% of patients, but found no significant difference in the occurrence of death, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or major adverse event among patients with or without HD; thus HD was considered to have no prognostic implication. HD occurred most often within the initial 6 h following CAS and usually resolved within 8–10 h.5,6 Delayed-onset HD, though rare, is almost always associated with intra-procedural HD.7 Lavoie1 observed that new-onset hypotension and bradycardia beyond six hours of CAS was seen in only 8% and 15% of patients respectively and that absence of HD during the initial six hours post-procedure bears a negative predictive value of 97% for occurrence of new HD beyond six hours.
Our patient had a late-onset refractory HD following CAS despite absence of HD during the procedure or in the subsequent six hours. The ECG performed after vasopressor infusion (Fig.1B), showed CHB in the presence of rapid atrial rate. This precludes vagotonia as a cause for CHB, and suggests inherent distal conduction system disease which became manifest with the sinus tachycardia induced by sympathetic stimulation. Paroxysmal atrio-ventricular block precipitated by tachycardia has been described in the presence of diseased His-Purkinje system; the only manifestation of distal conduction disease may be in the form of intra-ventricular conduction defect as noted in our patient.8 Sympathetic stimulation, although known to enhance atrial and nodal conduction, could impair the nodo-ventricular conduction that becomes pronounced in the presence of myocardial ischemia.9,10 Our patient concurrently developed severe global left ventricular hypokinesia. He had been on low-dose beta-blocker therapy (carvedilol 3.125 mg bid) for a long duration, which is unlikely to cause sudden HD in the post-procedure period. There was no clinical or electrocardiographic evidence of myocardial ischemia or infarction. The negative inotropic effect of vagotonia may have been the initial reason for myocardial depression, but subsequently CHB with slow ventricular rate could have further lowered cardiac output and coronary perfusion, worsening left ventricular function; these factors, superimposed on pre-existing moderate left ventricular systolic dysfunction, might have resulted in electromechanical dissociation that could not be resolved.
4. Conclusion
In the case described, HD occurred for the first time eight hours after CAS, and ended fatally despite vigorous resuscitatory efforts; this very unusual presentation and outcome may have been related to pre-existing moderate left ventricular systolic dysfunction and new-onset CHB caused by vasopressor-induced sympathetic stimulation in the presence of covert distal conduction system disease.
Conflicts of interest
All authors have none to declare.
References
- 1.Lavoie P., Rutledge J., Dawoud M.A. Predictors and timing of hypotension and bradycardia after carotid artery stenting. Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:1942–1947. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mylonas S.N., Moulakakis K.G., Antonopoulos C.N. Carotid artery stenting-induced hemodynamic instability. J Endovasc Ther. 2013;20:48–60. doi: 10.1583/12-4015.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lin P.H., Zhou W., Kougias P. Factors associated with hypotension and bradycardia after carotid angioplasty and stenting. J Vasc Surg. 2007;46:846–853. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.07.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ullery B.W., Nathan D.P., Shang E.K. Incidence, predictors, and outcomes of hemodynamic instability following carotid angioplasty and stenting. J Vasc Surg. 2013;58:917–925. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.10.141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tan K.T., Cleveland T.J., Berczi V. Timing and frequency of complications after carotid artery stenting: what is the optimal period of observation? J Vasc Surg. 2003;38:236–243. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(03)00316-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Qureshi A.I., Luft A.R., Sharma M. Frequency and determinants of postprocedural hemodynamic instability after carotid angioplasty and stenting. Stroke J Cereb Circ. 1999;30:2086–2093. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.10.2086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gupta R., Abou-Chebl A., Bajzer C.T. Rate, predictors, and consequences of hemodynamic depression after carotid artery stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:1538–1543. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.08.079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lee S., Wellens H.J., Josephson M.E. Paroxysmal atrioventricular block. Heart Rhythm. 2009;6:1229–1234. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Moulopoulos S.D., Darsinos J., Sideris D.A. Atrioventricular block response to exercise and intraventricular conduction at rest. Br Heart J. 1972;34:998–1004. doi: 10.1136/hrt.34.10.998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Boachie-Ansah G., Kane K.A., Parratt J.R. Cardiac electrophysiological effects of isoprenaline, phenylephrine, and noradrenaline on normal and mildly “ischaemic” sheep Purkinje fibers. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1989;13:291–298. doi: 10.1097/00005344-198902000-00018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
