Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 30;35(2):63. doi: 10.1007/s11032-015-0266-9

Table 2.

Comparison of TGW associated with 6-SFT-A2 haplotypes in DH population in multi-environments

Year Haplotype DS WW
N Mean ± SD (g) P value N Mean ± SD (g) P value
2001 HapI 83 30.57 ± 6.28 0.001*** 83 33.81 ± 5.68 0.064
HapIII 63 33.81 ± 5.10 63 35.70 ± 6.44
2005 HapI 83 34.02 ± 6.49 0.002** 83 30.70 ± 6.11 0.023*
HapIII 63 37.22 ± 5.67 63 32.98 ± 5.72
2006 HapI 71 32.40 ± 4.82 0.024* 82 30.24 ± 5.47 0.016*
HapIII 55 34.34 ± 4.56 63 32.95 ± 6.13
2009 HapI 83 38.06 ± 5.27 0.002** 83 40.66 ± 4.81 0.040*
HapIII 63 40.65 ± 4.34 63 42.25 ± 4.35
2010 HapI 82 32.89 ± 5.04 0.002** 83 34.32 ± 5.41 0.001***
HapIII 59 35.66 ± 4.52 63 36.91 ± 4.33
2011 HapI 83 37.82 ± 4.21 0.021* 83 38.07 ± 4.64 0.105
HapIII 63 39.43 ± 4.06 63 39.40 ± 5.14

DS drought stressed, WW well-watered, N number of DH lines

*, **, *** Significance at P ≤ 0.05, P ≤ 0.01, and P ≤ 0.001, respectively