Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr;6(2):115–125. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2014.091

Table 2. Univariate and multivariate associations between patient characteristics and survival.

Characteristic Hazard ratio (95% CI) P value
Univariate associations
    Age: ≥65 vs. <65 2.1 (1.2-3.9) 0.014*
    Age: continuous 1.0 (1.0-1.1) 0.009*
    Gender: female vs. male 0.9 (0.5-1.6) 0.771
    ECOG: ≥1 vs. 0 1.2 (0.6-2.4) 0.565
    Histologic grade: poorly differentiated vs. other 1.2 (0.6-2.5) 0.61
    Tumor diameter: maximum cm (continuous) 1.1 (1.0-1.2) 0.202
    Tumor diameter: >3 vs. ≤3 cm 1.2 (0.6-2.2) 0.636
    Adjuvant therapy received: no vs. yes 2.1 (1.2-3.8) 0.013*
    Lymph node involvement at resection: yes vs. no 2.3 (1.0-4.9) 0.038*
    T stage: T2 vs. ≥T3 0.9 (0.4-1.9) 0.8
    Positive margin at resection: yes vs. no 2.1 (1.1-3.9) 0.016*
    Lymphovascular invasion: yes vs. no 2.2 (1.1-4.5) 0.027*
    Perineural invasion: yes vs. no 3.2 (1.3-8.3) 0.013*
Multivariate associations
    Adjuvant therapy received: no vs. yes 3.6 (1.8-7.0) <0.001*
    Positive margin at resection: yes vs. no 3.5 (1.8-6.8) <0.001*
    Lymph node involvement at resection: yes vs. no 3.5 (1.5-8.2) 0.004*
    Age: continuous 1.0 (1.0-1.1) 0.035*

*, P<0.05. For categorical variables, the second group is the reference group for the Cox proportional hazard analysis. CI, confidence interval; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.