Table 3.
Linear regression analysis above and below threshold in males.
| Males < 23.4% body fat | Males >=23.4% body fat | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Standard coeff. | SE | p-value | Variable | Standard coeff. | SE | p-value |
| logTG (Model R2 = 0.034) | logTG (Model* R2= 0.238) | ||||||
| VAT | 0.14 | 0.10 | 0.17 | VAT | 0.57† | 0.08 | <0.001 |
| TFM | −0.19 | 0.10 | 0.06 | TFM | −0.22 | 0.08 | 0.008 |
| HDL-C (Model* R2= 0.124) | HDL-C (Model* R2 = 0.132) | ||||||
| VAT | −0.13 | 0.10 | 0.184 | VAT | −0.47† | 0.11 | <0.001 |
| TFM | 0.02 | 0.09 | 0.806 | TFM | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.430 |
| Insulin Sensitivity M/lbm (Model R2=0.040) | Insulin Sensitivity M/lbm (Model R2= 0.162) | ||||||
| VAT | −0.05 | 0.11 | 0.675 | VAT | −0.45† | 0.08 | <0.001 |
| TFM | 0.20 | 0.11 | 0.058 | TFM | 0.07† | 0.09 | 0.423 |
| Total Cholesterol (Model* R2 =0.135) | Total Cholesterol (Model* R2 =0.139) | ||||||
| VAT | 0.03 | 0.10 | 0.776 | VAT | 0.15† | 0.10 | 0.13 |
| TFM | −0.03 | 0.10 | 0.738 | TFM | −0.03 | 0.09 | 0.738 |
| LDL-C ( Model* R2= 0.095) | LDL-C (Model* R2=0.072) | ||||||
| VAT | 0.03 | 0.10 | 0.757 | VAT | 0.07 | 0.11 | 0.509 |
| TFM | 0.04 | 0.10 | 0.703 | TFM | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.489 |
| SBP (Model* R2=0.331) | SBP (Model* R2=0.362) | ||||||
| VAT | −0.06 | 0.09 | 0.466 | VAT | 0.26† | 0.09 | 0.03 |
| TFM | 0.03 | 0.09 | 0.764 | TFM | −0.04 | 0.08 | 0.748 |
| DBP (Model* R2=0.102) | DBP (Model*R2 = 0.217) | ||||||
| VAT | 0.16 | 0.11 | 0.141 | VAT | 0.28† | 0.11 | 0.012 |
| TFM | −0.07 | 0.10 | 0.492 | TFM | −0.02 | 0.09 | 0.839 |
| Glucose (Model R2=0.014) | Glucose (Model* R2= 0.121) | ||||||
| VAT | 0.13 | 0.10 | 0.218 | VAT | 0.19 | 0.11 | 0.069 |
| TFM | −0.07 | 0.10 | 0.467 | TFM | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.488 |
| Insulin (Model R2 = 0.011) | Insulin ( Model R2= 0.148) | ||||||
| VAT | −0.09 | 0.10 | 0.376 | VAT | 0.17† | 0.08 | 0.04 |
| TFM | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.271 | TFM | 0.24 | 0.08 | 0.003 |
VAT = Visceral Adipose tissue, TFM = Total Fat Mass
Indicates if coefficients are significantly different between models above and below threshold (p<0.01)
Indicates covariates factors with a significant association (indicated as dependent variable – significant independent variable)
For all models where Study was significant, PHPBC study (17) had a higher intercept than the Insulin study (16).
Models for males above ≥23.4% percent fat: TG – cigarette use status -current smoker > never = cessation; HDL-Study; Chol – Study; LDL-C Study; SBP – Study; DBP – Study; Glucose – Study
Models for males below <23.4% percent fat: HDL-C – Study, current smoker > Chol – Study; LDL-c – Study; SBP – Study; DBP – Race AA>Caucasian