Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov-Dec;18(6):481–501. doi: 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0061

Table 2. Methodological scoring of the articles included in the review.

Items / Score*
Studies 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Rating
Craniocervical posture
Braun6 W W W W W W W S WEAK
Hackney et al.11 W S W W W W W S WEAK
Lee et al.50 W W W W W M S S WEAK
Evcik and Aksoy12 W S W W W W M S WEAK
Sonnensen et al.10 W W S W S W W S WEAK
Visscher et al.8 W M S W S S S S WEAK
D’Attilio et al.51 W S S M M S M S MODERATE
Munhoz et al.13 W S S W W M W S WEAK
Ioi et al.52 W S S S M W W S WEAK
Iunes et al.22 W S S W M M M M WEAK
Matheus et al.15 W S S W S S W S WEAK
De Farias Neto et al.18 W S S W W S W S WEAK
Armijo-Olivo et al.19 W S S S S S S S STRONG
Armijo-Olivo et al.21 W S S S S S S S STRONG
Global Body posture
Darlow et al.5 W W W W W M M S WEAK
Zonnernberg et al.7 W S S M M W W M WEAK
Nicolakis et al.9 W W W W M M M S WEAK
Munhoz et al.14 W S S W W W W S WEAK
Munhoz et al.16 W W S W M S M S WEAK
Saito et al.17 W S S W W W M M WEAK
W = 20 W= 6 W = 6 W = 15 W = 9 W = 8 W = 9 W = 0
Total Score M = 0 M = 1 M = 1 M = 2 M = 6 M = 5 M = 7 M = 3
S = 0 S = 13 S = 13 S = 3 S = 5 S = 7 S = 4 S = 17

S=Strong; M=Moderate; W=Weak

*1- Types of studies; 2 - Diagnostic criteria; 3 - Volunteer agreement; 4 - Sample size; 5 - Method; 6 - Examiner blinding; 7 - External validity; 8 - Statistical analyses.