Table 4.
Results of likelihood ratio test comparing models without a random factor QTYPE (model 1) and with a random factor QTYPE (model 2).
| Reaction times (RTs) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1: RT ∼ ACT * WO * FREQ + (1| subj) + (1| item) | |||||||||
| Model 2: RT ∼ ACT * WO * FREQ + (1| subj) + (1| item) + (1| qtype) | |||||||||
| Df | AIC | BIC | logLik | Chisq | Chi | Df | Pr( > Chisq) | ||
| Model 1 | 11 | 96613 | 96688 | –48295 | |||||
| Model 2 | 12 | 95986 | 96068 | –47981 | 628.56 | 1 | <0.0001 | ||
| Accuracy of responses (ANS) | |||||||||
| Model 1: ANS ∼ ACT * WO * FREQ + (1| subj) + (1| item) | |||||||||
| Model 2: ANS ∼ ACT * WO * FREQ + (1| subj) + (1| item) + (1| qtype) | |||||||||
| Df | AIC | BIC | logLik | Chisq | Chi | Df | Pr( > Chisq) | ||
| Model 1 | 10 | 2777.3 | 2845.2 | –1378.7 | |||||
| Model 2 | 11 | 2587.2 | 2662.0 | –1282.6 | 192.06 | 1 | <0.0001 | ||
The test was performed for reaction times and accuracy of the responses to the comprehension task.