Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Feb 7.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Med Biol. 2015 Jan 14;60(3):1047–1067. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/3/1047

Table 3.

Summary of quantitative results for three anthropomorphic phantoms with metal implants. Listed for each phantom are the number of images analyzed, the mean percentage of bad pixels for those images, and the error metric Merror, which takes into account both the number of bad pixels and the magnitude of CT number errors of the bad pixels.

Imaging technique Hip prosthesis Dental fillings Spine stabilization rods



No. of images % bad pixels Merror No. of images a % bad pixels Merror No. of images % bad pixels Merror
Philips 120kVp 36 46.6 61.0 6 27.2 50.1 21 6.9 7.9
O-MAR 36 31.6 29.6 6 25.0 41.0 21 9.1 7.2
GE 120kVp 44 36.8 38.0 6 22.4 41.7 21 12.2 12.9
GSI 70keV 44 33.8 36.4 6 22.8 42.2 21 19.2 22.0
GSI 140keV 44 29.2 32.5 6 20.4 38.0 21 5.9 4.3
MARs 70keV 44 19.1 15.1 6 32.6 55.8 21 17.4 12.7
MARs 140keV 44 12.1 10.0 6 24.7 35.5 21 11.6 8.0
a

Includes two images (one superior and one inferior to the images containing the metal fillings) that do not contain any metal