Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 30.
Published in final edited form as: J Nutr Health Aging. 2011 Aug;15(8):725–730. doi: 10.1007/s12603-011-0058-9

Table 1.

Possible model populations of accelerated aging (with related weaknesses and strengths) on which targeting sarcopenia interventions.

Population Weaknesses Strengths
Healthy volunteers restrained from physical activities
  • -

    Ethical concerns, especially for longer term studies

  • -

    Difficult recruitment of older persons

  • -

    Possible easy recruitment

  • -

    Few clinical and biological confounders potentially affecting the study findings

Progeroid patients
  • -

    Ethical concerns

  • -

    Limited number of patients

  • -

    Not exactly mimicking normal aging

  • -

    Multisystemic accelerated aging

Bed-ridden subjects due to acute illness (e.g., influenza, hip fractures, elective surgery)
  • -

    Possible interference of the acute condition on the skeletal muscle decline

  • -

    Possible influence of treatment-related factors

  • -

    Possible easy recruitment

  • -

    Possible evaluation of specific (primary condition-based) stimuli on the determination of the muscle loss

Patients with specific conditions characterized by chronic elevation of inflammatory status (e.g., acquired immune deficiency syndrome [AIDS], rheumatoid arthritis)
  • -

    Limited number of (older) patients for some specific diseases

  • -

    Possible interference of the primary condition on the skeletal muscle decline

  • -

    Specifically focused on inflammation as determinant of muscle decline

  • -

    Multisystemic accelerated aging

Older subjects with initial muscle impairment
  • -

    Disabling process already started (thus, limited use for real preventive studies)

  • -

    Presence of (age-related) comorbidities

  • -

    Easy recruitment

  • -

    Specifically focused on older persons