Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2014 Sep 20;103:139–151. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.09.029

Table 2.

Age-specific findings for global and within-domain construct validity (CV), for behavior and topography of activation. Age groups were divided at median age Also provided in a test of the difference in magnitude of the CV between young and old CV (ΔCV), Significant results at p<0.05 are in bold.

Memory Fluid Speed Vocabulary Global
Behavioral construct validity
Old CV 0.25, p=0.08 0.44,p=0.02 0.74,p<0.01 0.58, p<0.01 0.50, p<0.01
Young CV 0.19, p=0.21 0.64, p<0.01 0.99, p<0.01 0.44, p=0.02 0.56, p<0.01
Young-Old
ΔCV
−0.06, p=0.70 0.20, p=0.06 0.25, p=0.10 −0.14, p=0.83 0.21, p=0.41
Topographic construct validity
Old CV 0.82, p=0.01 0.99, p<0.01 0.32, p=0.12 0.17, p=0.23 0.57, p<0.01
Young CV 0.63, p=0.03 0.76, p=0.02 0.39, p=0.06 0.27, p=0.17 0.51, p<0.01
Young-Old
ΔCV
−0.19, p=0.82 −0.23, p=0.80 0.08, p=0.38 0.10, p=0.29 −0.06, p=0.73