Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 23;115(1):41–49. doi: 10.1111/bju.12898

Table 2.

Secondary end points: response and progression

Response
EU NA
Enzalutamide (n = 461) Placebo (n = 223) Enzalutamide (n = 263) Placebo (n = 132)
% of patients
Patients with ≥1 post-baseline PSA assessment 92.6 85.2 89.0 78.0
 Decrease ≥50%* 55.0 1.6 51.3 1.9
 Decrease ≥90%* 23.0 1.1 26.9 1.0
Patients with measurable disease 53.6 52.9 58.6 52.3
 CR or PR* 29.1 5.1 26.6 2.9
Patients with ≥1 post-baseline HRQL assessment 81.6 67.3 81.4 56.8
 HRQL response* 44.1 18.7 42.1 17.3
Progression
End point EU NA
Enzalutamide (n = 461) Placebo (n = 223) HR Enzalutamide (n = 263) Placebo (n = 132) HR
Median (95% CI):
 Time to PSA progression, months 8.2 (5.7, 8.3) 3.0 (2.8, 3.7) 0.28* (0.22, 0.36) 8.3 (5.8, 8.4) 3.7 (3.0, 5.6) 0.26* (0.17, 0.40)
 rPFS, months 8.5 (8.2, 10.5) 2.9 (2.8, 4.5) 0.38* (0.32, 0.47) 8.3 (5.9, 9.7) 2.9 (2.8, 3.6) 0.43* (0.34, 0.55)
 Time to first SRE, months 17.4 (14.1, NYR) 11.9 (9.0, 15.2) 0.56* (0.43, 0.73) 16.7 (13.6, NYR) 18.2 (8.6, NYR) 0.79†† (0.56, 1.12)

CR, complete response; NYR, not yet reached; PR, partial response. *P < 0.001 for enzalutamide vs placebo. †Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate questionnaire. ††P = 0.185 for enzalutamide vs placebo.