Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Behav Health Serv Res. 2016 Apr;43(2):246–261. doi: 10.1007/s11414-014-9430-y

Table 1.

Participant demographics

Variable Pre-Post sample
n = 180
Total sample
N = 284

n % n % p1
Clinician 164 91.1 255 89.8 .333
Supervisor 33 18.3 52 18.3 .989
Female 144 80.0 228 80.3 .751
Ethnicity or Race .232
 Caucasian 152 84.4 236 83.1 --
 African American 6 3.3 7 2.5 --
 Hispanic or Latino 10 5.6 23 8.1 --
 Asian 6 3.3 9 3.2 --
 Other 5 2.8 7 2.5 --
Educational background .525
 High school/AA 0 0 2 0.8 --
 4-year college 9 5.0 13 4.6 --
 MSW 44 24.4 68 23.9 --
 Other Masters/PhD 127 70.6 201 70.8 --
Age .389
 Under 25 5 2.8 6 2.1
 25–29 49 27.2 68 23.9
 30–39 13 40.6 122 43.0
 40–49 28 15.6 46 16.2
 Over 50 25 13.9 41 14.4
 Missing 0 0 1 0.4
Frequency of CBT use .409
 Not in last 5 years 6 3.4 10 3.5
 Rarely 7 3.9 15 5.3
 Occasionally 11 6.1 22 7.7
 Sometimes 32 17.8 51 18.0
 Often 72 40.0 111 39.1
 Almost always 52 28.9 75 26.4
Receives CBT supervision 56 31.3 77 27.2 .043
Receives EBT-specific supervision 72 40.2 112 39.7 .819
Participants in champion agencies (CA) 37 21.3 33 17.3 .334
Supervisor in CA (of total supervisors) 5 16.1 4 19.0 .785
Left agency during study 8 4.4 28 9.9 < .001

Mean SD Mean SD

Consult call attendance 9.4 (n = 155) 1.9 8.7 (n = 230) 2.7 < .001
Years providing therapy 5.3 (n = 165) 5.0 5.6 (n = 262) 5.9 .248
1

Statistical tests compare pre-post sample with baseline-only sample (baseline-only data not depicted)