Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 20;101(6):613–621. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9465

Table 2.

Patients requiring further imaging to reach a diagnosis and therapy decision after initial imaging (efficacy population)

No. of patients requiring further imaging Test result
P Rate difference (%)
Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI 0 of 118 (0)  
ECCM-MRI 19 of 112 (17·0) < 0·001 (H03) 17·0 (11·4, 25·6)
CE-CT 44 of 112 (39·3) < 0·001 (H02) 39·3 (30·7, 49·8)
Pooled ECCM-MRI–CE-CT 63 of 224 (28·1) < 0·001 (H01) 28·1 (22·5, 34·6)

Values in parentheses are

*

percentages and

95 per cent repeated confidence intervals of the rate differences between gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and each of the comparators below, corresponding to the hierarchically ordered null hypotheses H01, H02, H03 (H0i:rategadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI ≤ ratecomparator(i) with i = 1,2,3)23,24. ECCM, extracellular contrast medium; CE-CT, contrast-enhanced computed tomography.

One-sided Fisher's combination test of the entire population.