Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 4;16(5):709–733. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12288

Table 1.

Standard membrane feeding assays with PPLP2(−)

Feed Infections/total (n) Oocysts/midguts (mean ± SD, range) Infection rate (%) Change in transmission (%)
Experimental setting 1: PPLP2(−) versus WT
Feed 1 Mock control 10/10 23 ± 12, 8–52 100 /
PPLP2(−) 5/10 1 ± 2, 0–7 50 −50
Feed 2 Mock control 8/10 6 ± 4, 0–11 80 /
PPLP2(−) 0/10 0 ± 0, 0 0 −100
Feed 3 WT 20/20 70 ± 30, 22–148 100 /
PPLP2(−) 4/20 0 ± 0, 0–1 20 −80
Feed 4 WT 19/20 33 ± 20, 0–69 95 /
PPLP2(−) 17/20 3 ± 3, 0–12 85 −11
Feed 5 WT 20/20 42 ± 22, 5–107 100 /
PPLP2(−) 19/20 5 ± 3, 0–13 95 −5
Experimental setting 2: Equinatoxin II (EqII) treatment
Feed 1 WT 17/20 8 ± 8, 0–30 85 /
WT + EqtII 18/20 11 ± 9, 0–26 90 +6
PPLP2(−) 4/20 0 ± 1, 0–2 20 /
PPLP2(−) + EqtII 14/20 1 ± 1, 0–4 70 +250
Feed 2 WT 17/20 5 ± 5, 0–17 85 /
WT + EqtII 15/20 4 ± 3, 0–10 75 −12
PPLP2(−) 1/20 0 ± 0, 0–1 5 /
PPLP2(−) + EqtII 5/20 0 ± 1, 0–2 25 +400