Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep;52(9):3223–3229. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00782-14

TABLE 2.

Use of anidulafungin to predict susceptibility patterns of caspofungin, using 4,290 clinical isolates of Candida spp. from a global surveillance programa

Species (no. tested) Anidulafungin category No. (%) in caspofungin category
S I R
C. albicans (2,307) S 2,282 (98.9) 10 (0.4) 3 (0.1)
I 9 (0.1) 1 (0.1)
R 7 (0.3) 3 (0.1)
C. glabrata (655) S 576 (87.9) 4 (0.6) 3 (0.5)
I 23 (3.5) 2 (0.3) 5 (0.8)
R 2 (0.3) 4 (0.6) 36 (5.5)
C. parapsilosis (539) S 496 (92.0) 1 (0.2)
I 42 (7.8)
R
C. tropicalis (515) S 508 (98.6)
I 1 (0.2) 1 (0.2)
R 1(0.2) 4 (0.8)
C. krusei (124) S 114 (91.9) 6 (4.8)
I 3 (2.5)
R 1 (0.8)
C. guilliermondii (64) S 58 (90.6) 1 (1.6)
I 3 (4.7) 2 (3.1)
R
C. lusitaniae (57) WT 56 (98.2) 1 (1.8)
Non-WT
C. kefyr (29) WT 27 (93.1)
Non-WT 2 (6.9)
a

MIC interpretive criteria for each species as shown in reference 23. Abbreviations: S, susceptible; I, intermediate; R, resistant; WT, wild type; non-WT, non-wild type.