TABLE 2.
Spearman correlations between ELISA scores and QuIC metrics for CWD-positive deer
Parameter | All deer (n = 10) |
Mule deer (n = 5) |
Whitetail deer (n = 5) |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ρ | P | ρ | P | ρ | P | |
ThT score | −0.024 | 0.947 | 0.600 | 0.350 | 0.154 | 0.805 |
ThT amplitude | −0.116 | 0.751 | 0.000 | 1.000 | 0.051 | 0.935 |
ThT slope | −0.377 | 0.283 | 0.200 | 0.783 | −0.821 | 0.089 |
ThS score | 0.413 | 0.235 | 0.600 | 0.350 | 0.154 | 0.805 |
ThS amplitude | 0.456 | 0.185 | 0.500 | 0.450 | 0.308 | 0.614 |
ThS slope | 0.699 | 0.024a | 0.700 | 0.233 | 0.975 | 0.005a |
Significant result. ρ values indicate the strength of relationships for individual deer species, but the statistical power to detect significant relationships is decreased, owing to the small sample sizes in these cases.