Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep;52(9):3325–3333. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00742-14

TABLE 4.

Comparison of the PCR methods

Specimen IDa Reported qPCR method (log10 copies/ml of specimen) for segment:
cvPCR result forb:
qPCR result (log10 copies/ml of specimen):
P valuec
S M L Mean Set 1 Set 2 NP GPC RdRp Mean
057A 5.02 5.75 5.60 5.46 + + 6.23 6.57 5.24 6.01 NSd
062A1 4.61 4.87 4.81 4.76 + + 5.62 6.14 5.58 5.78 <0.01
064A 3.53 3.62 3.57 + + 4.01 4.54 3.57 4.04 NS
067A 5.42 5.70 5.61 5.58 + + 6.75 7.13 6.72 6.86 <0.001
078A3 3.67 4.15 4.11 3.98 + + 4.69 5.23 4.46 4.79 NS
082A 4.76 4.89 4.89 4.85 + + 5.81 5.99 5.47 5.76 <0.05
090A 5.28 5.57 5.51 5.45 + + 6.06 6.46 6.14 6.22 NS
097A1 4.86 4.43 4.64 + + 5.08 5.69 4.32 5.03 NS
076A
079A
081A
092A
093A
094A1
HB29 (2 × 105 TCID50/ml) 6.01 6.13 6.02 6.05 + + 6.46 6.48 6.38 6.44 NS
a

ID, identification.

b

+, detected; −, not detected.

c

P value was computed using a one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni's multiple-comparison test.

d

NS, not significant.