Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov;52(11):4033–4035. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01950-14

TABLE 2.

Distribution of HPV6, -16, -18, -42, -53, and -68a discordant and concordant results, according to viral load

Genotype Riska No. of samples by viral loadb
Pc
+−
+
++
+++
Disc. Conc. Disc. Conc. Disc. Conc. Disc. Conc.
6 L 3 1 2 3 0 10 0 23 <0.0001
16 H 3 1 2 7 0 30 0 14 <0.0001
18 H 3 1 1 3 0 4 0 0 0.0244
42 L 3 3 2 9 0 14 0 6 0.0038
53 L 7 0 2 1 0 8 0 21 <0.0001
68a H 2 0 1 0 3 1 6 0 0.3481d
Total, including HPV68a 38 31 13 95 5 213 6 126 <0.0001
Total, excluding HPV68a 36 31 12 95 2 212 0 126 <0.0001
a

L, low risk, H, high risk.

b

+−, doubtful PCR and barely detectable RBH signal; +, weak; ++, medium; +++, strong PCR/RBH signal (6). The numbers indicated are pooled from single and multiple infections. Only the specific genotypes with ≥4 discordant results are shown. Disc., number of discordant cases; Conc., number of concordant cases. The attribution to the viral load category was based on the higher value for each pair (PGv1 versus PGv2 result).

c

Chi-square analysis for trend addressing whether discordance is associated with viral load.

d

P > 0.05.