Table 3.

Comparison of nested LMMs fitted to log-transformed SRTs in Experiment 1.

			Model comparison
Model	df	Formula	AIC		df	p
Natural faces
nat 0	7	logSRT ∼ 1 + Gap + RE	3315
nat1	9	logSRT ∼ 1 + Gap × Attractiveness + RE	3311	7.40	2	0.025
nat2	21	logSRT ∼ 1 + Gap × Attractiveness × GI + RE	3324	11.68	12	0.472
nat3	69	logSRT ∼ 1 + Gap × Attractiveness × EGI + RE	3368	52.06	48	0.319
Morphed faces
mor0	7	logSRT ∼ 1 + Gap + RE	3679
mor1	13	logSRT ∼ 1 + Gap × GI + RE	3687	4.34	6	0.631
mor2	37	logSRT ∼ 1 + Gap × EGI + RE	3714	20.75	24	0.652