. 2015 Jan 12;112(4):1131–1136. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1424012112

Table 1.

GSEA comparing differential RNA and protein expression patterns observed for MCF-10A-H1047R vs. MCF-10A with previously established breast cancer signatures

Gene set^*	Size	NES	P	Dataset
SMID BREAST CANCER BASAL UP^†	446	1.59	0	RNAseq
SMID BREAST CANCER BASAL DN^‡	434	−1.2	0	RNAseq
SMID BREAST CANCER NORMAL LIKE UP^§	178	1.5	0.003	RNAseq
SMID BREAST CANCER ERBB2 UP^¶	97	1.32	0.071	RNAseq
SMID BREAST CANCER LUMINAL B UP^#	99	−1.34	0.056	RNAseq
SMID BREAST CANCER LUMINAL B DN^ǁ	287	1.96	0	RNAseq
SMID BREAST CANCER BASAL UP	149	1.51	0.006	SILAC
SMID BREAST CANCER BASAL DN	113	1.3	0.049	SILAC
SMID BREAST CANCER NORMAL LIKE UP	32	1.72	0	SILAC
SMID BREAST CANCER ERBB2 UP	47	1.69	0	SILAC
SMID BREAST CANCER LUMINAL B UP	26	−1.11	0.318	SILAC
SMID BREAST CANCER LUMINAL B DN	98	1.64	0	SILAC

Size represents number of genes. DN, DOWN; NES, normalized enrichment score.

As listed in the MSigDB (www.broadinstitute.org/gsea/msigdb).

^{^†}

Genes up-regulated in the basal subtype of breast cancer (36).

^{^‡}

Genes down-regulated in the basal subtype of breast cancer (36).

^{^§}

Genes up-regulated in the normal-like subtype of breast cancer (36).

^{^¶}

Genes up-regulated in ERBB2⁺ breast cancer (36).

^{^#}

Genes up-regulated in the luminal B subtype of breast cancer (36).

^{^ǁ}

Genes down-regulated in the luminal B subtype of breast cancer (36).