Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 2.
Published in final edited form as: J Midwifery Womens Health. 2008 Nov-Dec;53(6):511–521. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2008.04.013

Table 1.

Rates of Specific Risk Factors and Mean Number of Risk Factors for Each Group of Women

Risk factors No abuse (n=882)
n(%)
Adult only (n =123)
n (%)
Child only (n =175)
n(%)
Both periods (n =79)
n(%)
Overall (n=1,259)
n(%)
pa
Individual factors
 1. Teen (age 18–20) 194 (22.0) 28 (22.8) 47 (26.9) 28 (35.4) 297 (23.6) .002
 2. African American 373 (42.3) 63 (51.2) 86 (49.1) 44 (55.7) 566 (45.0) .024
 3. Household income <$15,000 180 (20.4) 29 (23.6) 51 (29.1) 24 (30.4) 284 (22.6) .023
 4. High school or less education 390 (44.2) 64 (52.0) 68 (50.3) 61 (64.6) 593 (47.1) .002
 5. Inner city residence 386 (43.8) 61 (49.6) 89 (50.9) 51 (64.6) 587 (46.6) .002
Risk factors considered as a sum, mean (SD)b 1.7 (1.8) 2.0 (1.8) 2.1 (1.9) 2.5 (1.7) 1.8 (1.8) .001c
a

df = 3, p value is for chi square testing differences in rates of each risk factor occurring among the groups.

b

0 = Having none of the above demographic risk factors. 5 = Having all 5 risk factors.

c

Post-hoc contrast between having no abuse versus having abuse in both periods is the only significant difference.