Table 1.
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. ER 18 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||
2. EE 18 | .05 | 1.00 | |||||||||||
3. EFR 18 | .09 | .25** | 1.00 | ||||||||||
4. Child sex | −.01 | .04 | .00 | 1.00 | |||||||||
5. EMP 24 | .14† | .15* | .16* | −.12 | 1.00 | ||||||||
6. EMP 30 | .21** | .20** | .23** | −.12† | .70** | 1.00 | |||||||
7. EMP 42 | .20** | .25** | .25** | −.02 | .52** | .62** | 1.00 | ||||||
8. EMP 48 | .23** | .23** | .25** | .08 | .49** | .53** | .57** | 1.00 | |||||
9. EMP 54 | .35** | .16* | .17* | .06 | .43** | .56** | .65** | .68** | 1.00 | ||||
10. PB 72/84 | .18* | .13 | .10 | −.10 | .25** | .29** | .23** | .32** | .28** | 1.00 | |||
11. Income 18 | .03 | −.07 | .03 | .13* | .00 | −.08 | −.01 | .07 | −.05 | .09 | 1.00 | ||
12. Fa. Ed. 18 | .02 | .01 | .05 | .04 | −.02 | −.01 | −.10 | .12 | −.05 | .27** | .49** | 1.00 | |
13. Mo. Ed. 18 | .09 | .03 | .05 | .05 | .05 | .04 | .03 | .15† | .04 | .14† | .60** | .60** | 1.00 |
M | 6.76 | 4.78 | 5.95 | .54 | 2.22 | 2.35 | 2.49 | 2.48 | 2.49 | 3.74 | 4.08 | 4.19 | 4.28 |
SD | (.72) | (1.23) | (.62) | (.50) | (.44) | (.40) | (.38) | (.35) | (.36) | (.72) | (1.74) | (1.21) | (1.07) |
Note. ER = ego-resiliency (mother/caregiver reports combined); EE = mothers’ expressive encouragement; EFR = mothers’ emotion-focused reactions; EMP = mothers report of child empathy; PB = child prosocial behavior with peers (teacher report); Fa. Ed. = fathers’ education; Mo. Ed. = mothers’ education; Child sex (0 = girls, 1 = boys). M = mean; SD = standard deviation.
p < .10.
p < .05.
p < .01.