Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 10;123(2):144–151. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1307951

Table 1.

Descriptive characteristics (mean ± SD or %) of study participants.

Characteristic Emphysema cohort Lung function cohort
1-year estimate(n= 6,515) 20-year estimate(n = 4,813) 1-year estimate(n = 3,791) 20-year estimate(n = 2,811)
Percent emphysema (%), –910 HU 19.9 ± 13.4 20.5 ± 13.6 20.2 ± 13.3 20.7 ± 13.5
Airflow limitation (%)a 5.7 5.8 5.9 5.9
Percent predicted FEV1 93.9 ± 17.8 93.5 ± 18.1 93.8 ± 17.9 93.4 ± 18.2
Percent predicted FVC 95.5 ± 16.2 95.2 ± 16.3 95.4 ± 16.2 95.2 ± 16.3
Percent predicted FEV1/FVC 98.5 ± 10.7 98.4 ± 10.9 98.4 ± 10.7 98.3 ± 10.9
FEV1 (L) 2.4 ± 0.7 2.4 ± 0.7 2.4 ± 0.7 2.4 ± 0.7
FVC (L) 3.2 ± 1.0 3.2 ± 1.0 3.2 ± 1.0 3.2 ± 1.0
FEV1/FVC (%) 75.1 ± 8.5 75.0 ± 8.7 75.0 ± 8.5 74.9 ± 8.6
Age (years) 62 ± 10 62 ± 10 61 ± 10 62 ± 10
Female (%) 54 53 51 50
Race/ethnicity (%)
White 37 43 36 39
Black 28 30 24 28
Chinese 11 7 15 10
Hispanic 24 21 25 22
Education (%)
Less than high school 17 15 18 15
High school 18 19 17 19
Higher education 47 47 46 46
Advanced degree 18 19 19 20
Any smoke exposure (%) 48 50 46 49
Smoking status (%)
Never 51 49 48 46
Former 36 38 42 44
Current 13 13 10 10
Pack-years of smoking (%)
0 52 50 54 52
≤ 10 19 19 16 15
> 10 and ≤ 20 10 10 9 9
> 20 20 21 21 23
Residential stability (years)
≥ 10 69 75 68 75
≥ 20 45 52 44 51
Study site (%)
Winston-Salem, NC 15 17 13 15
New York, NY 18 16 23 19
Baltimore, MD 14 16 11 14
St. Paul, MN 15 17 13 15
Chicago, IL 18 18 18 19
Los Angeles, CA 20 16 23 17
Air pollution
PM2.5 (μg/m3) 16.3 ± 3.7 22.0 ± 5.0 14.2 ± 2.4 22.2 ± 5.0
PM10 (μg/m3) NA 34.3 ± 7.7 NA 34.7 ± 7.7
NOx (ppb) 48.3 ± 25.2 NA 41.1 ± 21.1 NA
NA, not applicable. aAir flow restriction defined as an FEV1/FVC and FEV1 less than the lower limit of normal (LLN).