Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 31.
Published in final edited form as: Addict Behav. 2014 Oct 30;41:223–231. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.10.022

Table 3.

Drinking Outcomes across Assessments for Participants Abstinent at the End of CBT

Assessment
ES group time group x time
2-week 2-month 4-month p-value p-value p-value
Drinking days per week ATIVR 0.1 ± 0.2 0.1 ± 0.2 0.1 ± 0.2 .46 .06 .21 .09
Control 0.1 ± 0.1 0.6 ± 0.1 0.5 ± 0.2
Drinks per week ATIVR 0.3 ± 1.3 0.1 ± 1.3 0.4 ± 1.3 .43 .09 .16 .12
Control 0.3 ± 1.2 3.8 ± 1.2 3.5 ± 1.2
Drinks per drinking day ATIVR 2.6 ± 1.9 3.5 ± 1.9 4.3 ± 1.6 .11 .57 .36 .80
Control 3.4 ± 1.3 5.3 ± 1.1 4.8 ± 1.1
Percent reported drinking (last 30 days) ATIVR N/A 13 ± 6 10 ± 5* .51 .04 .71 .63
Control N/A 29 ± 7 30 ± 7
Percent reported Drinking Heavilyb (last 30 days) ATIVR N/A 3 ± 3 0 ± 0* .61 N/Aa N/Aa N/Aa
Control N/A 13 ± 6 16 ± 6

Note. Tabled values are least square means ± standard error based on analyses of covariance, unless otherwise noted. CBT = Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. ATIVR = Automated Therapeutic Interactive Voice Response. ES = Effect Size at 4-month assessment, reported in Cohen’s d.

a

GEE model did not converge due to no subjects reporting excessive drinking in ATIVR group at 4-months, significance based on Bonferroni adjusted chi-square tests within time point.

b

Drinking heavily refers to meeting National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism threshold for high-risk drinking (5+/4+ drinks in a day for men/women).

*

p <.05 for ATIVR vs. Control