Table 1.
Grid# spacing (Å) | Adaptive Cartesian Grid | Uniform Grid | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ΔGel (kcal/mol) | Number of Grid Points | CPU Time (s) | CPB ΔGel (kcal/mol) | APBS ΔGel (kcal/mol) | Number of Grid Points | CPU* Time (s) | ||
0.0625 | LSR | −1592 | 7.4×107 | 15735 | — | — | — | — |
No LSR | −1592 | 7.2×107 | 15570 | |||||
0.125 | LSR | −1591 | 1.1×107 | 1318 | — | — | — | — |
No LSR | −1592 | 1.0×107 | 1211 | |||||
0.25 | LSR | −1590 | 1.6×106 | 162 | −1593 | −1612 | 1.4×108 | 1048 |
No LSR | −1593 | 1.5×106 | 142 | |||||
0.5 | LSR | −1582 | 2.7×105 | 24 | −1620 | −1663 | 1.7×107 | 120 |
No LSR | −1620 | 2.4×105 | 19 | |||||
1.0 | LSR | −1546 | 5.8×104 | 6 | −2097 | −1706 | 2.1×106 | 19 |
No LSR | −2097 | 5.1×104 | 4 |
—, Calculations on uniform grids could not be performed for these grid spacings because doing so would have required more than the available memory.
These CPU times are those found for the APBS calculations. The CPU times for CPB on the same uniform grid were significantly longer than those for APBS because CPB is optimized to use an adaptive Cartesian grid.
The finest grid spacing was used for the adaptive Cartesian grid.