Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Feb 5.
Published in final edited form as: J Comput Chem. 2014 Nov 27;36(4):235–243. doi: 10.1002/jcc.23791

Table 1.

The electrostatic solvation energy (ΔGel) of barstar (PDBid: 1B3S) computed with the Adaptive Poisson-Boltzmann Solver (APBS) and CPB, with and without least-squares reconstruction (LSR) and on adaptive Cartesian and uniform grids. These calculations used a 2 Å Stern layer, a convergence tolerance parameter of 10−6 and the grid side length was set to twice the longest dimension of the molecule, but otherwise were performed as described in the Methods.

Grid# spacing (Å) Adaptive Cartesian Grid Uniform Grid
ΔGel (kcal/mol) Number of Grid Points CPU Time (s) CPB ΔGel (kcal/mol) APBS ΔGel (kcal/mol) Number of Grid Points CPU* Time (s)
0.0625 LSR −1592 7.4×107 15735
No LSR −1592 7.2×107 15570
0.125 LSR −1591 1.1×107 1318
No LSR −1592 1.0×107 1211
0.25 LSR −1590 1.6×106 162 −1593 −1612 1.4×108 1048
No LSR −1593 1.5×106 142
0.5 LSR −1582 2.7×105 24 −1620 −1663 1.7×107 120
No LSR −1620 2.4×105 19
1.0 LSR −1546 5.8×104 6 −2097 −1706 2.1×106 19
No LSR −2097 5.1×104 4

—, Calculations on uniform grids could not be performed for these grid spacings because doing so would have required more than the available memory.

*

These CPU times are those found for the APBS calculations. The CPU times for CPB on the same uniform grid were significantly longer than those for APBS because CPB is optimized to use an adaptive Cartesian grid.

#

The finest grid spacing was used for the adaptive Cartesian grid.