Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 5;35(3):693–701. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2015.2062

Table II.

Correlation between HMGA1 expression and clinicopathological parameters.

Variables n HMGA1
P-value
+ ++
Age (years), n (%) 0.077
 <50 87 37 (42.5) 44 (50.6) 6 (6.9)
 ≥50 72 23 (31.9) 38 (52.8) 11 (15.3)
Tumor type, n (%) 0.000
 Lobular 79 48 (60.8) 30 (38.0) 1 (1.3)
 Ductal 79 11 (13.9) 52 (65.8) 16 (20.3)
Tumor size, n (%) 0.814
 ≤2 cm 18 6 (33.3) 12 (66.7) 0 (0.0)
 >2 cm 141 54 (38.3) 70 (49.6) 17 (12.1)
Node metastasis, n (%) 0.208
 Negative 93 39 (41.9) 45 (48.4) 9 (9.7)
 Positive 66 21 (31.8) 37 (56.1) 8 (12.1)
Nuclear grade, n (%) 0.097
 1 3 0 (0.0) 2 (66.7) 1 (33.3)
 2 60 6 (10.0) 40 (66.7) 14 (23.3)
 3 12 4 (33.3) 7 (58.3) 1 (8.3)
ER, n (%) 0.090
 Negative 104 43 (41.3) 53 (51.0) 8 (7.7)
 Positive 55 17 (30.9) 29 (52.7) 9 (16.4)
PR, n (%) 0.105
 Negative 116 46 (39.7) 62 (53.4) 8 (6.9)
 Positive 43 14 (32.6) 20 (46.5) 9 (20.9)
HER2, n (%) 0.007
 Negative 130 54 (41.5) 66 (50.8) 10 (7.7)
 Positive 29 6 (20.7) 16 (55.2) 7 (24.1)

Data were from tissue microarrays (BR1921a), which consisted of 159 breast cancer cases, and were histologically interpretable and analyzed for the correlation with clinicopathological parameters. ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HMGA1, high mobility group A1.