Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 23;35(3):587–596. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2014.2047

Table II.

Parameter estimates and likelihood scores of PLA2 for site models in PAML.

Model np Estimates of parameters lnL LRT pairs df 2ΔlnL p-value Positively selected sites BEB (%)
M0:one ratio 94 ω=0.16513 −41914.67 M0/M3 4 366.4 5.04128E-78 None
M3:discrete 98 p0=0.18381, p1=0.61322, p2=0.20297, ω0=0.06840
ω1=0.14537,ω2=0.42278
−41731.47
M1a:neutral 95 p0=0.92349, p1=0.07651,ω0=0.15503, ω1=1.00000 −41830.79 M1a/M2a 2 0 1.00000 33M (55.5), 34K (52.8)
M2a:selection 97 p0=0.92349, p1=0.03595, p2=0.04056, ω0=0.15503, ω1=1.00000, ω2=1.00000 −41830.79
M7:β 95 p=2.25732, q=10.02539 −45800.80 M7/M8 2 8103.86 0.00000 28N (65.8), 34K (53.7), 50S (60.4), 54T (64.6), 58R (64.9), 75T (70.0), 88Q (77.2), 92R (50.1)
M8:β and ω 97 p0=0.99999, p=0.17653, q=1.31411, p1=0.00001, ω=2.52322 −41748.87

Selection analysis by site models was performed using CODEML implemented in PAML. np, number of free parameters; lnL, loglikelihood; LRT, likelihood ratio test; df, degrees of freedom; 2ΔlnL, twice the log-likelihood difference of the models compared; BEB, Bayes empirical Bayes approach. p-values with bold font indicate statistical significance.