. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Exp Anal Behav. 2014 Nov 23;103(1):50–61. doi: 10.1002/jeab.115

Table 3.

Omissions and response latencies (s) on forced- and free-choice trials (SEM) during the pre- and post-training adjusting-delay task.

	Pre-training		Post-training

	WMT	SHAM	WMT	SHAM
Forced-choice omissions	0.64 (0.47)	0.22 (0.11)	0.32 (0.21)	0.08 (0.03)
Free-choice omissions	0.35 (0.22)	0.11 (0.04)	0.22 (0.18)	0.08 (0.02)
Latency to respond: Forced-choice	1.91 s (0.14)	1.84 s (0.11)	1.77 s (0.15)	1.58 s (0.09)
Latency to respond: Free-choice	1.79 s (0.11)	1.79 s (0.10)	1.73 s (0.13)	1.64 s (0.10)

Note: Omissions and latencies to respond to forced- and free-choice trials were averaged over the final nine sessions of the adjusting-delay procedure. No significant between-group differences were observed. WMT, working-memory trained rats; Sham, sham-trained rats.