Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 22;9(3):1287–1292. doi: 10.3892/ol.2014.2819

Table II.

Effect of P-gp inhibitors and ABCG2 inhibitors on sunitinib resistance in HMEC-1 cells.

HMEC-1 HMECd1 HMECd2



Agents IC50, μM IC50, μM RI RF IC50, μM RI RF
Sunitinib 4.271±0.501 8.585±0.642 2.01a 1.00 19.252±0.855 4.51a 1.00
+ 5 μM fumC 4.359±0.622 5.886±0.417 1.35b 1.45 6.163±0.062 1.41b 3.12
+ 0.5 μM die 4.204±0.468 6.259±0.541 1.48b 1.37 7.159±0.057 1.70b 2.69
+ 1 μM vrp 4.952±0.875 9.159±0.356 1.84 0.94 17.659±0.526 3.57 1.09
+ 2.5 μM cysA 4.098±0.562 8.871±0.459 2.16 0.97 20.348±0.328 4.97 0.95

The cells were treated as described in the main text and tested with MTS assay. The RI was determined by: IC50 of Dox-treated HMECd1 or HMECd2 cells/IC50 of Dox-treated HMEC-1 cells. The RF was calculated by: IC50 of Dox-treated HMECd1 or HMECd2 cells/IC50 of the same cell line treated by sunitinib + P-gp or ABCG2 inhibitors.

a

P<0.05, vs. HMEC-1 cells;

b

P<0.05, vs. HMECd1 and HMECd2 cells without P-gp or ABCG2 inhibitors.

P-gp, P-glycoprotein; ABCG2, breast cancer resistance protein; RI, resistance index; RF, resistance fold; IC50, half maximal inhibitory concentration; Dox, doxorubicin; fumC, fumitremorgin C; die, diethylstilbestrol; vrp, verapamil; cysA, cyclosporine A.