Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Cogn Dev. 2015 Jan;16(1):11–30. doi: 10.1080/15248372.2013.833922

Table 1.

Means (in s) for infants’ looking to each stimulus type by pet group (SD in parentheses)

Group N Trial Type
Cat Dog Face Vehicle
Overall 48 2.06 a (.54) 2.16 a (.43) 2.46 b (.43) 2.03a (.47)
Pet 21 2.14 (.46) 2.17 (.40) 2.47 (.36) 1.97 (.39)
No Pet 17 1.96 (.62) 2.15 (.48) 2.44 (.51) 2.12 (.55)

* For the group as a whole, means with different subscripts differed significantly, p < .01. In other words, infants’ looking during the face trials was significantly greater than their looking during the other three trial types (comparisons were not conducted on the individual group means; the means are provided here for illustration purposes only).