Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 3.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychol. 2014 Sep 15;50(11):2449–2461. doi: 10.1037/a0037856

Table 3.

Selection Model: Predicting Odds of Membership in a Mixed Sex Friendship Group from Previous Wave Characteristics

Model 1: Basic Model 2: Demographic and Behavioral Controls
Fixed Effects Estimate SE Estimate SE
 Intercept  −2.23*** .15 −2.15*** .16
 Wave  0.45*** .09    .47*** .09
 Gender  −.07 .05  −.15** .05
 Wave*Gender  −.04 .03  −.04 .04
Problem Behaviors at Previous Wave
 Cigarette Use    .10 .06    .05 .06
Alcohol Use  −.16** .06  −.13* .06
Delinquency    .15*** .04    .12** .04
 Wave * Cigarette Use < .01 .03 < .01 .04
Wave * Alcohol Use    .08* .04    .10* .04
Wave * Delinquency  −.04 .03  −.06* .03
Outcome at Previous Wave
 Mixed Sex Group Membership    .71*** .07
 Wave * MSGM  −.16*** .05
Demographic & Behavioral Controls at Previous Wave
 White  −.16** .05
 Two-parent family < .01 .05
 Free/reduced lunch  −.01 .01
 Religious attendance  −.03*** .01
 Family relations    .04 .05
 School grades  −.10*** .02
 Network Centrality  −.32*** .04
Random Effects

 Between Community
  Intercept     1.21*** .28  1.09*** .25
  Wave       .44*** .10    .42*** .10
  Covariance Intercept, Wave     −.57*** .15  −.53*** .14
 Between Person
  Intercept       .24*** .04    .04 .05

Note.

***

p < .001,

**

p < .01,

*

p < .05;

N of participants included in this model = 9,898.