Table 4.

Influence Model: Predicting Cigarette Use from Mixed Sex Group Membership Status at Previous Wave

	Model 1: Basic		Model 2: Demographic & Behavioral Controls		Model 3: Controlling for Group Mean Cigarette Use
Fixed Effects	Estimate	SE	Estimate	SE	Estimate	SE
Intercept	1.21***	.01	.60***	.02	.61***	.02
Wave	.15***	.01	.06***	.01	.06***	.01
Gender	−.04***	.01	−.06***	.01	−.05***	.01
Wave * Gender	−.04***	.01	−.03***	.01	−.03**	.01
Mixed Sex (t-1)	.06***	.01	.04**	.01	.04*	.01
Outcome (t-1)
Cigarette Use			.60***	.01	.60***	.01
Wave * Cigarette Use			−.01	.01	−.01	.01
Controls (t-1)
White			< .01	.01	< .01	.01
Free/reduced lunch			.01**	< .01	.01*	< .01
Two-parent family			−.05***	.01	−.05***	.01
Religious attendance			−.01***	< .01	−.01***	< .01
Family relations			.13***	.01	.13***	.01
School grades			−.07***	.01	−.07***	.01
Bonacich Centrality			.02	.01	.02	.01
Peer Group Structure (t-1)
Group Size			< .01	< .01	< .01	< .01
Group Density			.01	.07	.01	.07
Group Reciprocity			−.09*	.04	−.07	.04
Group Transitivity			< .01	.04	< .01	.04
Peer Group Means (t-1)
White			.01	.03	.02	.03
Free/reduced lunch			−.01	.01	−.01	.01
Two-parent family			−.02	.03	−.01	.03
Religious attendance			−.01	< .01	−.01*	< .01
Family relations			−.04	.03	< .01	.03
School grades			−.05***	.01	−.03*	.01
Average Popularity			.03	.06	.02	.06
Cigarette Use					.15***	.03
Wave * Cigarette Use					.01	.02
Random Effects
Between Community
Intercept	.01***	< .01	< .01**	< .01	< .01*	< .01
Wave	< .01***	< .01	< .01**	< .01	< .01*	< .01
Covariance: Intercept, Wave	< .01***	< .01	< .01***	< .01	< .01*	< .01
Between Person
Intercept	.17***	< .01
Wave	.01***	< .01	.05***	< .01	.05***	< .01
Covariance: Intercept, Wave	.12***	< .01
Within Person
Residual	.28***	< .01	.36***	< .01	.36***	< .01

Note.

^***p < .001,

^**p < .01,

^*p < .05; N of participants included in this model = 9,715.