Table 1.
Characteristics of segments and image quality rated in CANVAS
A. Segment Characteristics | Mean | S.D. | Median | Min. | Max. | ICC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of steps | 19.48 | 13.28 | 17 | 2 | 101 | 0.99 | |
Percentage of steps obstructed(a) | 26.98 | 27.10 | 20 | 0.00 | 100.00 | 0.10 | |
B. Time to Rate (in minutes) | Mean | S.D. | Median | Min. | Max. | ICC | |
Entire segment | 17.11 | 10.00 | 14.59 | 4.72 | 108.78 | 0.07 | |
Building conditions module | 4.68 | 4.46 | 3.88 | 0.77 | 78.08 | 0.03 | |
Meta characteristics module | 3.65 | 4.30 | 2.63 | 0.63 | 54.37 | 0.04 | |
Land use module | 2.22 | 2.12 | 1.48 | 0.27 | 12.15 | 0.00 | |
Road and parking module | 1.63 | 1.16 | 1.44 | 0.28 | 14.25 | 0.00 | |
First intersection module | 1.58 | 1.65 | 1.27 | 0.37 | 21.43 | 0.04 | |
Sidewalk characteristics module | 1.52 | 3.10 | 1.20 | 0.05 | 61.13 | 0.06 | |
Pedestrian access module | 1.38 | 1.29 | 1.00 | 0.25 | 11.23 | 0.00 | |
Biking characteristics module | 0.46 | 0.78 | 0.25 | 0.07 | 10.92 | 0.12 | |
C. image Quality | Freq. | Pet. | ICC | ||||
Zoom level (number of clicks on zoom) where pixelation occurs | 0.06 | ||||||
0 | 14 | 3.11 | |||||
1 | 191 | 42.44 | |||||
2 | 118 | 26.22 | |||||
3 | 97 | 21.56 | |||||
4 | 30 | 6.67 | |||||
Legibility of street signs at initial zoom level | 0.53(b) | ||||||
Clearly legible | 136 | 30.22 | |||||
Blurry but legible | 84 | 18.67 | |||||
Unreadable | 178 | 39.56 | |||||
Camera technology | 0.82(c) | ||||||
Dark | 319 | 70.89 | (kappa) | ||||
Light | 131 | 29.11 |
Notes:
2 of segments had percentage of obstructed streets greater than 100 and were set to missing
The category “No sign visible” not included in intra-class correlation analysis
Kappa valuereported because camera technology included only two response categories