Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 3;10(2):e0117093. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117093

Table 1. PAML analysis of FTO.

Model Parameter Estimates In L LRT
Models 2Δl d.f. p-value
M0 ω0 = 0.1616 −1462.43 M0 vs. free-ratio 63.74 66 0.58
free-ratio variable −1430.56
M3 p0 = 0.40765, p1 = 0.39476, p2 = 0.19759, ω0 = 0.00264. ω1 = 0.12330, ω2 = 0.90116 −1365.70 M0 vs. M3 193.47 4 < 0.001
M1a p0 = 0.79894, p1 = 0.20106, ω0 = 0.05695, ω1 = 1.00000 −1378.39 M1a vs. M2a 0.61 2 0.74
M2a p0 = 0.79860, p1 = 0.16914, p2 = 0.03227, ω0 = 0.06053, ω1 = 1.00000, ω2 = 1.90635 −1378.09
M7 p = 0.21277, q = 0.75616 −1367.96 M7 vs. M8 3.71 2 0.22
M8 p0 = 0.94790, p = 0.26173, q = 1.37577 (p1 = 0.05210), w = 1.63117 −1366.10

All values computed under default settings. InL: log likelihood, LRT = likelihood ratio test to detect positive selection, d.f. = degrees of freedom.