Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 7;23(2):124–129. doi: 10.1007/s12471-014-0629-6

Table 3.

Data from a review of all six- to nine-month multi-centre registries or clinical trials of single Co-Cr stent types with more 100 patients (MEDLINE search results extend to 31 May 2013; table excludes studies restricted to patients presenting only with STEMI)

Registry Stent name Material Strut thickness (μm) Number of patients Average stent length (mm) Average stent diameter (mm) Presenting conditions Follow-up (months) Delivery success MACE TLR/TVRa
MULTIBENE [22] PRO-Kinetik SiC-coated L605 60–120 198 15.7 ± 3 .5 3.21 ± 0.45 No AMI 6 11.4 % 7.6 %
Arthos Pico Austrian Multicentre [23] Arthos Pico Phynox Co-Cr 65 203 16.2 ± 6.5 2.58 ± 0.22 Real-world 6 98.0 % 13.0 % 6.0 %
SOLSTICE SolarFlex L605 Co-Cr 65 240 17.5 ± 4.82 3.15 ± 0.38 Real-world 6 100 % 5.8 % 5.0 %
CoroFlex Blue registry [24] CoroFlex Blue L605 Co-Cr 65 2315 15.6 ± 4.4 3.01 ± 0.43 Real-world 6 98.5 % 9.2 % 5.5 %
MILES [25] Skylor L605 Co-Cr 70–95 1020 19.5 ± 10.3 3.03 ± 0.43 Real-world 6+ 98 % 9.9 % 5.0 %
VISION registry [17] Vision L605 Co-Cr 81 267 17.2 ± 6.3 3.34 ± 0.37 No AMI 6 100 % 6.2 % 4.3 %
VIVE [16] Vision L605 Co-Cr 81 429 Real-world 6 99.3 % 6.8 % 1.4 %
RISICO [18] Vision L605 Co-Cr 81 143 17.0 ± 3.9 2.41 ± 0.14 No AMI 6 96.7 % 11.6 % 5.8 %
Driver registry [26] Driver MP35N Co-Cr 91 298 Real-world 9 100 % 8.4 % 7.0 %
CLASS [27] Driver MP35N Co-Cr 91 202 No AMI 6 100 % 12.4 % 9.4 %

aWhere available as an endpoint, cTLR data were been used preferentially for comparison purposes