Skip to main content
Iranian Journal of Parasitology logoLink to Iranian Journal of Parasitology
. 2014 Sep;9(3):435–440.

Molecular and Parasitological Study of Cryptosporidium Isolates From Cattle in Ilam, West of Iran

Mahmoud MAHAMI OSKOUEI 1, Esmaeil FALLAH 1,*, Mahmoud AHMADI 2, Abdolrasoul SAFAIYAN 3, Salar BAKHTIYARI 4, Razi NASERIFAR 5,6, Majid DOUSTI 6
PMCID: PMC4316577  PMID: 25678930

Abstract

Background

Cryptosporidiosis is one of the most important parasitic infections in human and animals. This study was designed for survey on the prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection in farms of Ilam, west of Iran, using parasitology method and genotyping by Nested PCR-RFLP.

Methods

Fecal samples of 217 cattle were collected fresh and directly from the rectum of cattle. All of the samples were examined by microscopic observation after staining with modified Ziehl-Neelsen (MZN). Genomic DNA extracted by using EURx DNA kit. A Nested PCR-RFLP protocol amplifying 825 bp fragment of 18s rRNA gene conducted to differentiate species and genotyping of the isolates using SspI and VspI as restriction enzymes.

Results

The prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection in cattle using both methods is 3.68%. Most of the positive cattle were calves under six months. Species diagnosis carried out by digesting the secondary PCR product with SspI that C. parvum generated 3 visible bands of 448, 247 and 106 bp and digested by VspI restriction enzyme generated 2 visible bands of 628 and 104bp. In this investigation all of the positive samples were Cryptosporidium parvum.

Conclusion

C. parvum (bovine genotype) detected in all positive cattle samples in Ilam, west of Iran. The results of the present study can help for public health care systems to prevention and management of cryptosporidiosis in cattle and the assessment of cattle cryptosporidiosis as a reservoir for the human infection.

Keywords: Cryptosporidium, PCR-RFLP, Cattle, Iran

Introduction

Cryptosporidium is a coccidian parasite of humans, domestic animals, and wide range of other vertebrates (1,2). This parasite cause disorders of the digestive, respiratory systems and mainly diarrhea, which is particularly serious in neonatal and immunosuppressed individuals among its mammalian hosts and lead to poor health of infected animals and significant economic losses (25). However, the infection is self-limiting in healthy individuals (4). Water and food sources are important for transmission of this parasite (6). In addition, the disease can also be transmitted by person-to-person, aerosols and infected animals (3,6). C. parvum and C. hominis are the main species causing cryptosporidiosis (79).

Cattle are one of the major sources of C. parvum, which causes neonatal diarrhea in calves (10,11) and for zoonotic contamination including waterborne outbreaks (12). According to the previous investigations, bovine cryptosporidiosis is widespread and the range of the prevalence had been reported in different studies 14 to 80 percent (13). Although in different countries, several studies have been conducted on prevalence of Cryptosporidium species (1416), however little is known on the incidence of the parasite in Iran. Some information has been published about bovine and human cryptosporidiosis in Iran and epidemiological studies have not yet been conducted on a wide scale and in large number of hosts (17).

The diagnosis of this disease is generally based on the observation of oocysts in stool samples under light microscope, but this method have less sensitivity for epidemiological studies and not appropriate to determine the species of parasite. Recently, suitable methods such as molecular techniques are used for these purposes (18,19). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and restriction fragment length polymorphism technique (RFLP) of molecular methods have been successfully used for isolation and genotyping of Cryptosporidium in different samples (20).

As regards the health and economic importance of cryptosporidiosis, this study was designed for survey on the prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection in farms of Ilam, west of Iran, using parasitology method and species identification (genotyping) of oocysts based on nested PCR of the 18S rRNA gene, combined with restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis.

Materials and Methods

Sample collecting and processing

Overall, 217 cattle fecal samples were collected fresh and directly from the rectum of cattle during May to August 2013. The age of the cattle was categorized into <6 months (78 samples), 6-12 months (78 samples) and 12-24 months (61 samples). Samples mixed with 2.5% potassium dichromate (8) and passed through 4 layer gases. All fecal samples were examined microscopically for the presence of Cryptosporidium oocysts after concentration by formalin–ether technique and staining with modified Ziehl-Neelsen (MZN). Finally, positive samples in microscopic observation and 25 negative samples selected for molecular study.

DNA extraction

DNA purification kit (EURx, Poland) was used for genomic DNA extraction from the Cryptosporidium oocysts according to manufacturer instruction.

Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

To amplify a fragment of 18S rRNA gene, Nested-PCR was performed using outer primers: (forward: 5’-AACCTGGTTGATCCTGCCAGTAGTC-3’ reverse: 5’-TGATCCTTCTGCAGGTTCACCTACG-3’) for 1350 bp amplicon and inner primers: (forward: 5’-GGAAGGGTTGTATTTATTAGATAAAG-3’ reverse: 5’-AAGGAGTAAGGAACAACCTCCA-3’) for a 825 bp PCR product (5) in a total volume of 25 μl contained 1 μl DNA template, 2.5 mM PCR buffer, 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 2.5 mM Mgcl2, 10 pmol of each primer and 2.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase under the following conditions: 94°C for 5 min as initial denaturation, followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 68°C for 90 s and 72°C for 90 s with a final extension of 10 min at 72°C. Amplicons were visualized by electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose gel and stained in ethidium bromide solution for 10 min and photographed under UV light.

Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP)

The restriction fragment analysis for species-and strain-specific diagnosis of Cryptosporidium parasites was performed by digestion of the secondary PCR product with SspI (Fermentas) for species diagnosis and VspI (Fermentas) for genotyping of C. parvum, under condition recommended by the supplier. The digested products were fractionated on a 2% agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized by ethidium bromide staining and photographed using UV transilluminator. The species were characterized according to Xiao et al. (21).

Results

The prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection in cattle using both methods was 3.68% (8 out of 217). There was no significant difference between the rate of the infection in calves less than 6 months and those between 6-12 months of age (P>0.05) but in adults was significantly different from those less than 6 months of age (P<0.05). After genomic DNA extraction, nested-PCR was conducted for amplification of 1350 bp and 825 bp fragments in the first and second PCR reaction, respectively (Fig 1). Most of the positive cattle were calves under six months. Species diagnosis was carried out by digesting the secondary PCR product with SspI (Fig 2).

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Agarose gel electrophoresis of 18S rRNA secondary PCR products of Cryptosporidium isolates. Lane N: negative control (without template DNA), Lane P: positive control (C. parvum), Lanes 1-4: samples from cattle, M: 100bp DNA size marker

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Profile of the RFLP analysis for differentiation of Cryptosporidium species in calve fecal samples based on 18s rRNA using SspI restriction enzyme that recognized C. parvum in all of the positive samples. Lanes 1-3: digested secondary PCR products of the samples, M: 100bp DNA size marker

C. parvum generated 3 visible bands of 448, 247 and 106 bp. Secondary PCR product was digested by VspI restriction enzyme (Fig 3). C. parvum generated 2 visible bands of 628 and 104bp. All of the positive samples were C. parvum.

Fig 3.

Fig 3

Profile of the RFLP analysis for differentiation of Cryptosporidium genotypes in calve fecal samples based on 18s rRNA using VspI restriction enzyme that recognized C. parvum bovine genotype in all of the positive samples. Lanes 1, 2: digested secondary PCR products of the samples, M: 100bp DNA size marker

Discussion

The Present study is the first report on the prevalence and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium in cattle in Ilam, west of Iran.

The rate of positive results obtained 3.68% that is lower than the other similar studies such as Karanis et al. (22), Radfar et al. (23) and Xiao et al. (21) with the positive rates 18.1%, 18.9% and 88.4% respectively. Koyama et al. recorded a low prevalence (1.5%) of Cryptosporidium infection in adult cattle in Japan (24). Gow and Waldner also reported 1.1% in beef cows and 3.1% in other cows at western Canadian cow-calf herds (25). Much of the studies indicate that bovine cryptosporidiosis has a low prevalence in adults and acts as asymptomatic carries of infection so will be a source of infection for younger animals. A number of factors, including climatic conditions, locations of sampling, volumes of samples, diversity of animals in the areas, ecosystems, season and some of technical difficulties for the recovery of Cyptosporidium oocysts may contribute in these variations (3). It was observed that the majority of the animals between 1-6 months of age were found to have cryptosporidiosis caused by C. parvum, compared to those above six months and one year of age as the similar observations were also presented by other investigators (2629).

Not only calves, but also adult cattle were found to be excreting the oocysts. Thus, asymptomatic adult cattle can be regarded as playing the role of a reservoir for Cryptosporidium that might lead to the infection of human or other domestic animals. Our findings showed that there was no significant difference between the rate of the infection in calves less than 6 months and those between 6-12 months of age, while the infection rate amongst adults was significantly different from those less than 6 months of age. Digestion of secondary PCR product with VspI and SspI showed the presence of C. parvum bovine genotype in 8 cases (100%) in cattle isolates. The other similar studies of Cryptosporidium positive cattle in few countries all of isolates were belonged to C. parvum (3032). But in some studies, C. parvum and C. andersoni were found in adult cattle (20, 33). Our findings indicated that C. parvum is responsible for cattle cryptosporidiosis in this region.

Based on the results of this study, bovine genotype of C. parvum is the predominant genotype in the cattle’s of this region and indicates that cattle must be considered as a major risk for transmission and may be contribute as a public health concern because the bovine genotype of C. parvum takes in to accounts for most cases of human cryptosporidiosis in Iran (20, 31).

Conclusion

C. parvum (bovine genotype) was detected in all positive cattle samples in Ilam, west of Iran. Domestic animals particularly cattle can play an important role in transmission of Cryptosporidium oocyst to human. The results can help for public health care systems to prevention and management of cryptosporidiosis in cattle and the assessment of cattle cryptosporidiosis as a reservoir for the human infection.

Acknowledgments

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Morgan U, Weber R, Xiao L, Sulaiman I, Thompson RC, Ndiritu W, Lal A, Moore A, Deplazes P. Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium isolates obtained from human immunodeficiency virus-infected individuals living in Switzerland, Kenya, and the United States. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38(3):1180–3. doi: 10.1128/jcm.38.3.1180-1183.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Watanabe Y, Yang CH, Ooi HK. Cryptosporidium infection in livestock and first identification of Cryptosporidium parvum genotype in cattle feces in Taiwan. Parasitol Res. 2005;97(3):238–41. doi: 10.1007/s00436-005-1428-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Manouchehri Naeini K, Asadi M, Hashemzade Chaleshtori M. Detection and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium species in recreational waters of Chaharmahal va Bakhtiyari province of Iran using nested-PCR-RFLP. Iran J Parasitol. 2010;6(1):20–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Current WL, Reese NC, Ernest JV, Bailey WS, Heyman MB, Weinstein WM. Human cryptosporidiosis in immunocompetent and immunodeficient persons. Studies of outbreak and experimental transmission. N Engl J Med. 1983;308(21):1252–7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198305263082102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Xiao L, Escalente L, Yang C, Sulaiman I, Escalente AA, Montali RJ, Fayer R, Lal AA. Phylogenetic analysis of Cryptosporidium parasites based on the small-subunit rRNA gene locus. Applied Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;65(4):1578–83. doi: 10.1128/aem.65.4.1578-1583.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mclauchlin J, Amar C, Pedraza-Diaz S, Nichols GL. Molecular epidemiological analysis of Cryptosporidium spp. in the United Kingdom: results of genotyping Cryptosporidium spp. in 1,705 fecal samples from humans and 105 fecal samples from livestock animals. J Clin microbial. 2000;38(11):3984–90. doi: 10.1128/jcm.38.11.3984-3990.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gatei W, Greensill J, Ashford RW, Cuevas LE, Parry CM, Cunliffe NA, Beeching NJ, Hart CA. Molecular analysis of the 18S rRNA gene of Cryptosporidium parasites from patients with or without human immunodeficiency virus infections living in Kenya, Malawi, Brazil, the United Kingdom, and Vietnam. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:1458–62. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.4.1458-1462.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Coupe S, Sarfati C, Hamane S, Derouin F. Detection of cryptosporidium and identification to the species level by Nested PCR and restriction fragment length polymorphism. J Clin Microbal. 2005;43:1017–23. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.3.1017-1023.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Katsumata T, Hosea D, Ranuh IG, Uga S, Yanagi T, Kohno S. Short report: possible Cryptosporidium muris infection in humans. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2000;62(1):70–2. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2000.62.70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.De la Fuente R, Luzon M, Ruiz-Santa-Quiteria JA, Garcia A, Cid D, Orden JA, Garcia S, Sanz R, Gomez-Bautista M. Cryptosporidium and concurrent infectious with other major enteropathogens in 1 to 30-day-old diarrheic dairy calves in central Spain. Vet Parasitol. 1999;80(3):179–85. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4017(98)00218-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lefay D, Naciri M, Poirier P, Chermette R. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection in calves in France. Vet Parasitol. 2000;89(1-2):1–9. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4017(99)00230-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kuroki T, Watanabe Y, Asai Y, Yamai S. An outbreak of waterborne cryptosporidiosis in Kanagawa, Japan. J Jpn Assoc Inf Dis. 1996;70(2):132–40. doi: 10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi1970.70.132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Esmail F, Ataallah H. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium oocysts from calves in Kurdistan province, of Iran. The Internet J Parasitic Dise. 2009;4(2) [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fayer R, Morgan U, Upton SJ. Epidemiology of Cryptosporidium: transmission, detection and identification. Int J Parasitol. 2000;30(12-13):1305–22. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7519(00)00135-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Joachim A, Krull T, Schwarzkopf J, Daugschies A. Prevalence and control of bovine cryptosporidiosis in German dairy herds. Vet Parasitol. 2003;112(4):277–88. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4017(03)00006-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jager M, Gauly M, Bauer C, Failing K, Erhardt G, Zahner H. Endoparasites in calves of beef cattle herds: Management systems dependent and genetic influences. Vet Parasitol. 2005;131(3-4):173–91. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pirestani M, Sadraei J, Dalimi asl A, Zawar M, Vaeznia H. Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium isolates from human and bovine using 18s rRNA gene in Shahriar county of Tehran, Iran. Parasitol Res. 2008;103(6):467–72. doi: 10.1007/s00436-008-1008-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Laxer MA, Timblin BK, Patel RJ. DNA sequences for the specific detection of Cryptosporidium parvum by the polymerase chain reaction. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1991;45(6):688–94. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1991.45.688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Xiao L. molecular epidemiology of Cryptosporidiosis: an update. Exp Parasitol. 2010;124(1):80–9. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2009.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Fallah E, Mahdavipoor B, Jamali R, Hatam Nahavandi K, Asgharzadeh M. Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium isolates from cattle in a slaughterhouse in Tabriz, northwestern Iran. J Biol Sci. 2008;8(3):639–43. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Xiao L, Alderisio K, Limor J, Royer M, Lal AA. Identification of species and source of Cryptosporidium oosysts in storm waters with a small-submit rRNA-based diagnostic and genotyping tool. Applied Environ Microbiol. 2000;66(12):5492–8. doi: 10.1128/aem.66.12.5492-5498.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Karanis P, Sotiriadou I, Kartashev V, Kourenti C, Tsvetkova N, Stojanova K. Occurrence of Giardia and Cryptosporidium in water supplies of Russia and Bulgaria. Env Res. 2006;102(3):260–71. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2006.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Radfar MH, Molaei MM, Baghbannejad A. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium SPP. oocysts in dairy calves in Kerman, southeastern Iran. Iranian J Vet Res. 2006;7(2):81–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Koyama Y, Satoh M, Meakawa K, Hilkosaka K, Nakai Y. Isolation of Cryptosporidium andersoni Kawatabi type in a slaughterhouse in the island of Japan. Vet Parasitol. 2005;130(3-4):323–6. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gow S, Waldner C. An examination of the prevalence of and risk factor for shedding of Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia spp. in cows and calves western Canadian cow-calf herds. Vet Parasitol. 2006;137(1-2):50–61. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.05.071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chi JY, Lee SH, Guk SM. An epidemiological survey of Cryptosporidium parvum infection in randomly selected inhabitants of Seoul and Chollanam-do. Korean J Parasitol. 1996;34(2):113–9. doi: 10.3347/kjp.1996.34.2.113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Conlon CP, Pinching AJ, Perera CU, Moody A, Luo NP, Lucas SB. HIV related enteropathy in Zambia: a clinical, microbiological and histological study. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1990;42(1):83–8. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1990.42.83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Roy SS, Pramanik AK, Batabyal S, Sarkar S, Das P. Cryptosporidiosis an important zoonotic disease. Intas Polivet. 2006;7:432–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ongerth E, Stibbs H. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection in dairy calves in Western Washington. Am J Vet Res. 1989;50(7):1069–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Saha Roy S, Sarkar S, Batabyal S, Pramanik AK, Das P. Observations on the epidemiology of bovine cryptosporidiosis in India. Vet Parasitol. 2006;141(3-4):330–3. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.06.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Meamar AR, Guyot K, Certad G, Dei-Cas E, Mohraz M, Mohebali M, Mohammad K, Mahbod AA, Rezaie S, Rezaian M. Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium isolates from humans and animals in Iran. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73(3):1033–5. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00964-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wielinga PR, de Vries A, van der Goot TH, Mank T, Mars MH, Kortbeek LM, van der Giessen JW. Molecular epidemiology of Cryptosporidium in humans and cattle in the Netherlands. Int J Parasitol. 2008;38(7):809–17. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2007.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Fayer R, Santin M, Trout JM. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium species and genotypes in mature dairy cattle on farms in eastern United States compared with younger cattle from the same locations. Vet Parasitol. 2007;145(3-4):260–6. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Iranian Journal of Parasitology are provided here courtesy of Tehran University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES