Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb;63:206–213. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.08.017

Table 2.

Analysis of estimated search slopes [Target emotion (angry, happy) × Target presence (×Group) ANOVA], sensitivity (d′), [set size (1, 6, 12) × Target emotion (angry, happy) (×Group) ANOVA], and response criterion [set size (1, 6, 12) × Target emotion (angry, happy) (×Group) ANOVA]. p-values are given after Greenhouse-Geisser correction of degrees of freedom for violations of multisphericity. Effect sizes are reported as η2.

Effect df ε F η2 p
Estimated search slope
Results within the control group
Emotion 1, 15 1 14.5 .461 <.001
Presence 1, 15 1 309.5 .948 <.0005
Emotion × Presence 1, 15 1 <1 .079 n.s.

Comparison of patient group and control group (effects not involving group are omitted)
Group 1, 16 5.2 .244 <.05
Group × Emotion 1, 16 1 4.5 .219 <.05
Group × Presence 1, 16 1 2.9 .152 n.s.
Group × Emotion × Presence 1, 16 1 <1 .005 n.s.

Sensitivity (d′)
Results within the control group
Set size 2, 30 .591 10.8 .419 <.005
Emotion 1, 15 1 14.9 .498 <.005
Set size × Emotion 2, 30 .686 5.3 .260 <.05

Comparison of patient group and control group (effects not involving group are omitted)
Group 1, 16 7.0 .305 <.05
Group × Set size 2, 32 .595 3.0 .159 =.09
Group × Emotion 1, 16 1 <1 .002 n.s.
Group × Set size × Emotion 2, 32 .675 1.7 .098 n.s.

Response criterion
Results within the control group
Set size 2, 30 .844 <1 .050 n.s.
Emotion 1, 15 1 2.5 .142 n.s.
Set size × Emotion 2, 30 .690 3.1 .171 =.08

Comparison of patient group and control group (effects not involving group are omitted)
Group 1, 16 22.3 .752 <.0005
Group × Set size 2, 32 .829 8.9 .358 <.005
Group × Emotion 1, 16 1 4.3 .212 =.05
Group × Set size × Emotion 2, 32 .736 1.4 .079 n.s.