Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 4.
Published in final edited form as: Semin Speech Lang. 2014 Apr 29;35(2):114–131. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1371755

Table 1.

Summary of selected empirical studies of the temperament and emotional characteristics of young children who do (CWS) and do not stutter (CWNS).

Study Method of temperament / emotion assessment Participants Findings

N Age


Total CWS
(n girls)
Total CWNS
(n girls)
Overall
Range
Mean (SD)

CWS CWNS
  Published empirical investigations
Anderson et al. (2003) Behavior Style Questionnaire (BSQ) 31 (6) 31 (6) 3;0 - 5;4 years 48.03 months 48.58 months CWS, compared to CWNS, exhibited less distractibility, nonadaptibility to change, and irregular biological functions on BSQ
Arnold et al. (2011) EEGs and behavioral observation of emotion regulation 9 (3) 9 (3) 3;0 - 5;11 years 4;5 (9) years 4;8 (8) years No between-group (CWS vs. CWNS) difference in EEGs. Within-group: For CWS, decreased behavioral regulatory strategies related to increased stuttering
Choi et al. (2013) Behavioral inhibition assessed by latency to 6th spontaneous utterance45 26 (4) 28 (15) 3;0 - 5;8 years 48.89 (8.00) months 46.96 (6.93) months No between-group difference in behavioral inhibition (BI). Within-group: More CWS exhibited extremely high than extremely low BI. CWS with higher BI exhibited more stuttering than low BI CWS
Eggers et al. (2010) Children's Behavior Questionnaire (CBQ) 58 (13) 58 (13) 3.04 - 8.11 years 5.11 (1.09) years 5.11 (1.10) years CWS, compared to CWNS, scored higher on scales of ‘anger/frustration’ and lower on ‘inhibitory control’ and ‘attentional shifting’ on CBQ
Eggers et al. (2012) Computerized Attention Network Test 41 (10) 41 (10) 4;0 - 9;0 years 6;09 (1;05) years 6;09 (1;05) years CWS, compared to CWNS, exhibited significantly lower efficiency of the orienting network
Eggers et al. (2013) Inhibitory control assessed via a Go/NoGo task 30 (6) 30 (6) 4;10 - 10;00 years 7;05 (1;05) years 7;05 (1;05) years CWS, compared to CWNS, exhibited lower inhibitory control via more false alarms and premature responses, lower reaction time for false responses, less ability to adapt response style after experience responses errors
Embrechts et al. (1998) Children's Behavior Questionnaire 38 (N/A) 38 (N/A) 3 - 7 years N/A N/A CWS, compared to CWNS, exhibited higher activity level and impulsivity but lower attentional focusing, inhibitory control
Felsenfeld et al. (2010) Multiple parental report measures (e.g., Child behavior checklist) 826 19,072 5;00 - 7;00 years N/A N/A CWS, compared to CWNS, received parental ratings of more problematic attention abilities
Howell et al. (2004) Behavioral Style Questionnaire (BSQ) 10 (3) 10 (3) 3;7 – 7;2 years 5;10 (1.36) years 5;4 (1.16) years CWS, compared to CWNS, more active and negative as well as less adaptable and persistent
Johnson et al. (2010) Behavioral observation of emotion during disappointing gift procedure 16 (5) 16 (5) 3;0 - 5;9 years 46.69 (8.55) months 48.44 (8.89) months CWS, compared to CWNS, exhibited more negative emotional expressions after receiving an undesirable gift
Johnson et al. (2012) Reaction time and accuracy during two tasks of shifting and focusing attention 12 (0) 12 (0) 3;0 - 5;11 years 58.00 (6.78) months 58.83 (9.20) months No significant between-group differences in reaction time or accuracy
Karrass et al. (2006) Behavior Style Questionnaire 65 (22%) 56 (41%) 3;0 - 5;11 years 48.89 (9.56) months 48.9 (8.58) months CWS, compared to CWNS, were more emotionally reactive and less able to regulate their emotions and attention
Lewis and Golberg (1997) Parent Childhood Temperament Questionnaire for 3-7 Year-Olds 11 (2) 11 (2) 35 - 58 months 46.55 (N/A) months 46.36 (N/A) months CWS, compared to CWNS, are less negative and more adaptable
Ntourou et al.(2013) Behavior observation during emotion eliciting experimental paradigm 18 (4) 18 (4) 3;0 - 5;11 years 51.67 (9.71) months 53.61 (9.49) months CWS, compared to CWNS, exhibited more negative emotion and self-speech. Within-group: CWS exhibited lower stuttering frequency during narrative tasks when they diverted their attention from a preceding emotion-inducing non-speech task
Ortega and Ambrose (2011) Salivary samples collected four times daily 9 (3) N/A 6 - 11 years Males: 9.2 (N/A); Females: 9.5 (N/A) years N/A CWS, compared to published references established for normal children, exhibited significantly lower, though within normal limits salivary cortisol responses
Reilly et al. (2013) 30-item Short Temperament Scale for Children 181 (N/A) 1438 (N/A) 2 - 4 years N/A N/A No between-group differences in temperament and social-emotional development
Schwenk et al. (2007) Behavioral observation of attention and adaptation to background stimuli 18 (8) 18 (8) 3;0 - 5;11 years 47.1 (8.7) months 51.1 (9.9) months CWS, compared to CWNS, less able to ignore irrelevant background stimuli
Van der Merwe et al. (2011) Salivary cortisol and child- and parent-based tests of anxiety 7 (2) 7 (2) N/A 4;1 (N/A) years Matched No significant between-group differences in trait and state anxiety
Walden et al. (2012) Behavioral observation of emotion and emotion regulation and Children's Behavior Questionnaire 19 (6) 22 (13) 37 - 60 months 46.5 (N/A) months 49.3 (N/A) months For CWS, stuttering frequency was higher when high emotional arousal was accompanied by low emotion regulation

Note: All reported values for chronological age are as reported in the original study.