Table 3. Effectiveness of different coupling reagentsa.
| ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
entry | coupling reagentb, c | T/°C | time/h | % conversiond, e |
1 | triphosgene | 45 | 0.5 | 94% |
2 | DIC/HOAt | 45 | 0.5 | 34% |
3 | HATU/HOAt | 45 | 0.5 | 11% |
4 | TFFH/HOAt | 45 | 0.5 | 9% |
5 | PyBrOP/DMAP | 45 | 0.5 | trace |
6 | HBTU | 25 | 12 | trace |
7 | TBTU | 25 | 12 | trace |
8 | PyBOP | 25 | 12 | trace |
9 | amino acid chloridef | 25 | 2 | trace |
10 | DAST | 25 | 2 | trace |
Optimization studies were performed with peptide 9 sequence; results of amide bond formation between an N-allylalanine residue and FmocGlu(tBu)-OH on Rink amide resin are shown.
With microwave irradiation; see the experimental section for details.
DMF was used as a solvent with all coupling agents except for THF with triphosgene.
Determined from analytical HPLC.
Results after three different treatments with the Fmoc amino acid and coupling agent.
Pre-synthesized nosyl amino acid chloride.8