Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 4.
Published in final edited form as: Dig Dis Sci. 2013 Jul 10;58(10):2756–2766. doi: 10.1007/s10620-013-2744-4

Table 2.

Controlled trials of SCFA and colitis

Patients, n Treatment Results Reference
47 SCFA enema versus placebo No significant differences [86]
103 SCFA enema versus placebo No significant differences [87]
51 5-ASA and NaB enema versus 5-ASA and placebo Significant increase in remission and improvements in clinical scores, stool frequency, urgency, and self-assessment [88]
11 NaB enema versus placebo Significant decrease in DAI scores, reduction of NF-κB translocation in lamina propria macrophages [89]
335 NaB enema versus placebo Minor effects on inflammatory parameters and no significant effects on oxidative stress parameters [90]
39 NaB enema versus placebo No significant differences [91]
45 Corticosteroids versus 5-ASA versus SCFA enema Similar improvement, although SCFA more cost-effective [92]
30 Oral mesalazine and butyrate versus oral mesalazine and placebo Improvement in clinical and UCDAI scores [93]

SCFA short-chain fatty acids, UCDAI ulcerative colitis disease activity index