Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Stat Methods Med Res. 2016 Jul 11;26(1):280–291. doi: 10.1177/0962280214544730

Table 1.

Empirical Power Based on 1000 Simulated Cohorts for Incident and Prevalent Designs with the Same Sample Size and the Same Follow-up Duration. Cens %, censoring percentage; LT, conditional test for left-truncated data; 23 LR, log-rank test; PM, permutation test. 18

Incident Design Prevalent Design
θ Cens%a LRa Cens%b LRb Cens% PM LR LT
Exp: λ0 = 0.15, τ1 = 4, type I censoring at τ = 8
0.4 34 30.7 23 33.7 23 64.2 64.6 29.9
0.5 32 44.4 22 52.5 22 82.2 82.9 44.9
0.6 31 59.2 21 67.6 21 91.7 92.3 58.7
0.7 29 75.3 20 77.9 19 98.3 98.5 71.4
Exp: λ0 = 0.15, τ1 = 4, Uniform censoring (0,8)
0.4 70 17.4 52 25.7 52 55.3 50.3 18.9
0.5 68 22.7 51 36.3 51 74.5 71.7 30.7
0.6 67 31.6 49 48.7 49 85.5 82.6 40.3
0.7 66 41.6 48 59.6 48 95.4 93.9 52.7
Weibull: shape=1.5, scale=2, τ1 = 1, type I censoring at τ = 3
0.4 32 30.7 23 37.1 13 57.9 59.5 37.0
0.5 34 43.8 24 50.4 14 75.2 77.0 51.5
0.6 36 57.7 26 66.0 15 88.8 90.2 63.5
0.7 38 67.6 28 76.7 17 96.8 97.1 77.0
Weibull: shape=1.5, scale=2, τ1 = 1, Uniform censoring (0, 3)
0.4 72 13.2 60 21.5 46 45.0 44.8 21.7
0.5 73 19.8 61 29.1 47 65.0 62.0 30.6
0.6 74 24.0 62 38.3 48 80.5 78.9 41.5
0.7 75 33.6 64 43.0 49 89.4 88.3 50.9
a

participants are recruited with staggering entry from (0, τ1) in incident cohort

b

participants are recruited at the beginning of the study at time 0, similar to prevalent cross-sectional sampling.