Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cogn Emot. 2014 Aug 4;29(5):900–909. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2014.944106

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(a) Proportion of correctly identified keywords across the four noise conditions (i.e., 1- talker babble, 2-talker babble, 8-talker babble, and SSN) in the groups with high (solid line) and low (dash line) depressive symptoms. Error bars represent standard deviation. (b) Proportion of correctly identified keywords in the 1-talker babble condition as a function of the extent of depressive symptoms indicated by CES-D score in the high depressive symptom group. The straight line represents the best-fitting line for the data points. r represents the correlation coefficient between proportion of correctly identified keywords and CES-D score. * denotes p < .05.