Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 26;473(3):820–830. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3736-1

Table 3.

Survival and failures after reconstructions with megaprostheses: data from previous reports

Author Year Number of cases Average followup (months; range) Anatomical site Prosthesis type Cement Survival at 5 years Survival at 10 years Infection failure Prosthesis breakage Loosening failure
Ahlmann et al. [1] 2006 211 37.3 (1–204) Lower limb MSRS™ (Stryker, Mahwah, NJ, USA) Cemented 78% 60% 5.2% 4.3% 2.4%
Gosheger et al. [16] 2006 250 45 Mixed MUTARS® (Implantcast,Buxtehude, Germany) Uncemented 89.7% upper limb, 68.5% lower limb 60.4 % overall 12% 1.6% 8%
Biau et al. [4] 2006 91 62 (0.5–343) Distal femur, proximal tibia GUEPAR® (Paris, France) Cemented 85% femur, 72% tibia 55% femur,43% tibia 11.0% 7.7% 15.4%
Myers et al. [29] 2007 335 144 (60–360) Distal femur STANMORE (Stanmore, UK) Mixed 83% 67% 9.6% 2%
Jeys et al. [25] 2008 661 60 (120–420) Mixed STANMORE Cemented 58% 11.3% 6.1% 11.3%
Guo et al. [19] 2008 104 47 (12–118) Distal femur, proximal tibia Custom-made Cemented 70.5% 6.7% 6.7% 2.9%
Shehadeh et al. [34] 2010 232 120 (60–324) Mixed MSRS™ (Stryker) Cemented 84% 72% 10.8% 4.3% 7.4%
Schwartz et al. [33] 2010 186 96 (1–336) Distal femur Modular r-h custom-made (Stryker/Howmedica, Mahwah, NJ, USA; Techmedica, Camarillo, CA, USA; Dow-Corning Wright, Arlington, TN, USA) Cemented 88% 77% (20-year 58%) 3.2% 5.4% 11.8%
Healey et al. [21] 2013 82 43 (6–131) Distal femur COMPRESS® (Biomet, Warsaw, IN, USA) Uncemented 85% 80% 6.1% 6.1% 3.7%
Pala et al. [31] 2013 295 50 (24–96) Mixed GMRS™ (Stryker) Uncemented 68% 58% 9.5% 0% 5.1%
Our series 2013 200 67 (24–149) Lower limb Megasystem C® (Waldemar Link, Hamburg, Germany) Mixed 75.9% 66.2% 9.5% 8% whole series 0.8% of 116 patients with modified cone 3.0%