Table 2.
Carotenoids in plasma and omega-3 fatty acids in erythrocytes by diagnosis
Living in community residence | Living with relatives | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||||||||||
Prader–Willi syndrome (n=20) |
Williams syndrome (n=21) |
Down syndrome (n=24) |
Down syndrome (n=16) |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Carotenoids (µmol/l) | Median | Q1 | Q3 | Median | Q1 | Q3 | Median | Q1 | Q3 | Median | Q1 | Q3 |
Lycopene | 0.806 | 0.564 | 0.918 | 0.579 | 0.490 | 0.875 | 0.810 | 0.554 | 1.113 | 0.822 | 0.686 | 0.896 |
Lutein | 0.259* | 0.220 | 0.328 | 0.149 | 0.119 | 0.267 | 0.186 | 0.145 | 0.206 | 0.178 | 0.143 | 0.211 |
Zeaxanthin | 0.084* | 0.051 | 0.104 | 0.051 | 0.029 | 0.091 | 0.054 | 0.048 | 0.076 | 0.060 | 0.042 | 0.068 |
β-Cryptoxanthin | 0.258* | 0.176 | 0.326 | 0.138 | 0.069 | 0.248 | 0.128 | 0.103 | 0.227 | 0.121 | 0.074 | 0.177 |
α-Carotene | 0.227* | 0.178 | 0.377 | 0.084 | 0.041 | 0.126 | 0.103 | 0.066 | 0.146 | 0.076 | 0.048 | 0.116 |
β-carotene | 0.984* | 0.519 | 1.335 | 0.456 | 0.327 | 0.538 | 0.351 | 0.239 | 0.482 | 0.365 | 0.262 | 0.465 |
Total carotenoids | 2.76* | 2.14 | 3.14 | 1.63 | 1.17 | 2.22 | 1.76 | 1.34 | 1.99 | 1.65 | 1.43 | 1.81 |
Omega-3 fatty acids (w %) | ||||||||||||
ALAa | 0.193 | 0.180 | 0.209 | 0.189 | 0.172 | 0.203 | 0.201 | 0.174 | 0.220 | 0.207 | 0.162 | 0.228 |
EPAb | 2.00 | 1.30 | 2.83 | 1.00** | 0.75 | 1.40 | 1.10 | 0.90 | 1.70 | 1.20 | 1.10 | 1.45 |
DPAc | 2.60 | 2.40 | 3.05 | 2.50** | 2.35 | 2.90 | 2.75 | 2.63 | 3.10 | 2.70 | 2.60 | 2.88 |
DHAd | 6.90 | 6.00 | 8.03 | 5.40** | 4.65 | 6.30 | 6.15 | 5.80 | 7.50 | 6.75 | 5.25 | 7.30 |
Total omega-3 FAs | 12.12 | 9.80 | 13.50 | 9.30** | 8.55 | 10.51 | 10.19 | 9.44 | 12.75 | 10.67 | 9.56 | 11.72 |
Median plasma concentrations of carotenoids and median erythrocyte fatty acids presented with 25th and 75th percentiles (Q1 and Q3).
α-Linolenic acid, C18:3;
eicosapentaenoic acid, C20:5;
docosapentaenoic acid, C22:5;
docosahexaenoic acid, C22:6.
p<0.05 when participants with PWS were compared to participants with WS and DS using linear regression models, adjusted for BMI.
p<0.05 when participants with WS were compared to participants with PWS and DS using linear regression models, adjusted for BMI.